View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 08:40 PM   #244
Priest31kc Priest31kc is offline
Veteran
 
Priest31kc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: JCMO
Casino cash: $5485291
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO View Post
we didn't have the no. One last year
Posted via Mobile Device
Exactly.

And we knew Matt Cassel was coming back so of course we would've rather have had Orton than him.

Signing Alex Smith would most likely mean we are giving him the starting job like mentioned, meaning we most likely won't draft a QB #1 overall and if we do draft a QB in the 2nd or 3rd, they won't start either.

Meaning Alex Smith is our starting QB for a few years. Yay.

Not.

Same thing this franchise has always done.

Was Smith better under Harbaugh? Sure. Was he a franchise type QB? Of course not. He got benched for a 2nd round pick that never played a down in the NFL yet and he's now about to be released. Franchise QBs don't get released or traded.

But its okay for the Chiefs to sign him up and start him because that's what we've always done and it's always worked out for us right?

Just no to Alex Smith. Unless of course he accepts backing up our draft pick, but he won't.
__________________
KANSAS CITY ROYALS 2015 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS

I AM A MAHOMESEXUAL
Posts: 4,708
Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.Priest31kc would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote