View Single Post
Old 01-25-2013, 03:50 PM   #652
Rambozo Rambozo is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish View Post
We've had 2 drafts with the new CBA. But that's irrelevant. We can't base our strategy on any other year. Especially last year which featured the greatest rookie QB class in forever.

Most here aren't looking at Tannehill. He has nothing to do with this draft. All you're doing is making comparisons to other drafts, and using that to justify avoiding QB. But that's not how it works.

And I completely agree that it's not just about the talent level of the QBs. But in this draft, there aren't any other positions with standout players that could be seen as can't miss prospects.

So what we're left with is a class with no definitive standouts at any position. Since there's no standouts at any position, it lessens the allure of BPA, and puts focus on which player can best help the Chiefs' specific situation. If we look at the Chiefs, we see that they've heavily addressed the OLine over the last few drafts, and already have a well above average LT. What they don't have, is a single QB worth 2 shits.

Even though the QBs in this draft don't exhibit assurances as highly as last year's draft, it's still a guarantee that there will be one or more playoff caliber QBs from this class. Even though the risk is higher than last year with QB, the reward for getting it right completely dwarfs the reward for getting any other position right. While the risk of bust remains the same.
The first draft was per the old cba rules even though it occurred after the new agreement was reached.

There may not be a definative stand out like Luck last year or Clowney will be next year but, that's always the case when there isn't a sure thing QB going #1. It hasn't happened much lately. Mario Williams and Jake Long were the last two that weren't QBs.

There is a ton of talent at the top of this draft. Far more talent than there is at the QB position. I think most NFL people would disagree about your theory that taking a QB would not set you back 2-3 years. It absolutely would despite the new cba. It's not about losing the money. It's about losing the talent all around and you are going to continue picking early over and over never getting anywhere.


You guys should not even say the word superbowl. We just need to put together a solid team right now. Soon, maybe we can win a playoff game but, talking about the Superbowl is ridiculous. We have been in this position so many times over the last decade that I can't believe the homerism at times.
Posts: 459
Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Rambozo < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
    Reply With Quote