Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dog
I can even respect your belief that a league with x, y , or z settings works better for your leagues for whatever reason, but your schtick on this point has gotten old.
|
No, it's irritating because I know I'm right. And everyone who sees the light and plays in one of these leagues always tells me "holy shit, that league was way more fun/competitive..."
but 90% of the people I talk to about this, and even an entire facebook message chat between a league of 14 guys where 13 objected to the idea of an OP league...completely reject it because it's not what they are "used" to...
they like the leagues that are "realistic" where RB's account for 30 of the first 40 picks...where starting 3 RB's is realistic but starting 2 QB's isn't!!!
It's ****ing reeruned. I tell you what, I'll set up a 12 team league just like the one I linked and I'll invite all of you to play...$50 a man and I'll add an additional $100 to my $50 buy in to the prize pool...we'll play a year and then at the very end tell me it wasn't the most competitive, thought invoking fantasy football league you've ever been in.
I hear every week people complaining about how "unlucky" they are etc. etc. etc.
Play in a league that starts 3 WR's, a FLEX and an OP and then tell me how unlucky you get...the cream always rises in this league.
This year, the top 6 point scorers all made the playoffs (6 teams make the playoffs)...
The way I have this league set up makes for the absolute most realistic and skillful FFL. Plain and simple.
I guarantee in 5 years 2 QB (or OP) leagues will be the norm. Just guarantee it.