Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre
AJ Klein brings you exactly what Manti Teo brings you. Just sayin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan
He thinks we don't understand his argument. That if all the QBs are equal then take the BPA, which is Teo. He keeps missing that we understand his argument but think he is completely wrong that the QBs are equal and that Teo is not the BPA. He then wanted us all to just invite ourselves into his hypothetical for a moment. When we didn't, we were idiots who don't think as logically as he does. He doesn't seem to understand that we don't give a **** about his hypothetical. We are talking about what actually is, and that involves Teo not being BPA and Bray/Glennon/Barkley not being equal to Geno or Wilson.
|
So, **** my Hypothetical. Bray and Wilson are on par with Geno, and Barkley is up in the air.
Te'o is hands down the best ILB going into the combine. If I believe any of those 4 QB's are available in the 2nd round, I take Te'o hands down, as I believe there is no real separation at QB, and until I see evidence of that, I'll stick with it.
Sorry, that is just sound logic right there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
I agree with SNR here. Te'o isn't even as good as Luke Keuchly was last year.
I don't see a big difference between Te'o and Ogletree/Skov/Minter.
|
And that's where I disagree, I think there is a difference and that difference is pass coverage mainly, but I might even agree with you on Keuchly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
Why sacrifice ILB value when we can sacrifice QB value? /Excreter
|
I think you mean, why sacrifice ILB value when you don't have to sacrifice QB value, ****stick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
The problem is, he doesn't have a grasp of positional value.
I don't give a rat's **** if Te'o is the petri dish love child of Dick Butkus, Pat Willis, Jack Lambert, Mike Singletary, Brian Urlacher and Ray Lewis. (And he's not close to these guys and we know it, it's just that this functionally reeruned dipshit doesn't know it. He probably paid for the ESPN Insider and feels the need to validate his purchase by parroting Kiper.)
He's still a Mike in a 34. The ****ing punter has more positional value. The right offensive guard has more positional value.
And this dumb **** just doesn't get it. At all.
Either that or he's the archangel of all internet trolls.
I'm going with the former. There's no way possible a troll would put forth so much effort in such inane and excessive forum loquaciousness. The guy is just one amazingly stubborn dipshit.
|
Trolling, definitely. Stubborn, absolutely, dumb? Nahhh.
I understand positional value, but I think you're seriously overvaluing many positions on our roster, and overvaluing or even undervaluing many players at their respective positiions.
Even in a 34, Mike is still one of the most important positions on the field.
Then again, I'm a total homer because I played Mike in school
Now you have it, it is all unveiled, I'm going homer for Te'o because I played his position when I played football (unlike most of you).