Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
Oh, and sac has not claimed once that geno is a better prospect than Luck, you dumbass.
|
Don't give me that bullshit.
He is comparing Genos stats to luck and using lucks interception track record as justification for wh his success was overstated.
He continues to imply that luck succeeded because of talent whereas geno doesn't have that. I pushed back and said lucks biggest reason for success was much more about a flawless skill set and off the charts football iq. Sac is selling to us that geno could step into Stanford and do the same things luck did.
He is trying to downplay lucks resume, trying to imply luck wouldn't have succeeded with Genos supporting cast, and strongly implying that geno could have succeeded in Stanford's football iq heavy offense in the same way luck did.
Give me a break. Just because he's on your side now doesnt mean ou should act like all of a sudden his exaggerated optimism is suddenly acceptable.