|
If we do a Foles trade, I'd actually rather eat the value at the top than miss out on some of the quality starters that can be had in the middle rounds this year. In particular, that's where the Packers excelled at drafting the past several years, so I'm only to assume that Dorsey's got this shit under control when it comes to that department.
Give Philly the #1 overall. Take their #4 overall, Foles, a middle round this year, and next year's 1st.
That would be the ONLY fair trade in terms of value, but there's no effing way Philly goes for that deal just so they can get an OT or a DE. If they're interested in Geno, then maybe they would go for it. Likely, we would have to leave out one of the parameters of that trade, which would mean we're taking it up the ass pretty hard. And even THEN, the Eagles still wouldn't do that trade if they like Foles as much as they say they do.
So we're back to square one. No option we take is "good value" unless it's a QB with the first pick.
Y'know what, it's easier to just say "**** Foles" and move on with Geno.
|