Quote:
Originally Posted by bricks
You're implying that they should draft a QB #1 overall IF that QB is a for sure Blue Chip prospect. A once in 15 year type of talent that comes out (i.e., John Elway and Andrew Luck).
That's a little unrealistic if you ask me. There comes a time where you gotta draw the gun. You don't seem like the guy that is a fan of being a gunslinger. You reek of conservatism. No offense. In other words, you don't want to see them make the pick unless it is a john Elway or Andrew luck type of talent. you don't want to see them take a QB for the sake of taking a qb, but then what about the risk factor involved that comes with drafting a QB?
provided that the QB isn't an Andrew Luck or John Elway but has the POTENTIAL to be good?! Or, could just as easily be a bust? You don't want to face that risk factor do you? Drafts are hit and miss dude. Thats the nature of it.
*Its the conservative approach that the fans are tired of and would like to see a change by taking risks. ESPECIALLY at QB position. It's the conservative approach to the position that has set us back for years. Thats where fans like TC are trying to get at. I understand him all along. Not trying to stick up for the dude but I get where he is going.
|
JFC.
What a bunch of bullshit. In the past 12 years, I've NEVER once stated the Chiefs shouldn't take a QB in the first round. They should have traded their entire ****ing draft for RGIII last year.
My reason for participating in this discussion is that as of today, January 7, 2013, NO QB has separated himself from the pack and as of today, Andy Reid didn't rule out waiting until next year to find a Franchise QB.
People that can't understand that are just plain ****ing stupid. But Bricks, you've ALWAYS been ****ing stupid and worthless, so I'm not surprised.