Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraus
I honestly think this will be how MW3 still wins. BF3 was meant to be played on the PC and the console players will get a dumbed down version of it. Meanwhile, MW3 was built for consoles and will sell like crazy. If BF3 really wants to take the throne of top modern shooter, each system should get all the features.
|
I CONSIDER THEM TWO PRETTY DIFFERENT GAMES AT THIS POINT.
sry caps. I will buy and play both (BF3 70%, MW3 30%) something like that I'm sure.
Battlefield takes a much bigger time commitment per session where as COD is more of a jump on, jump off type of game.
I prefer Battlefield because you can still win even with players that aren't exactly "skilled" as long as you work together. When a team is clicking is so awesome to be involved in. Especially when you're giving to a bunch of highly ranked players.
COD is simply a collection of the kids with the best skills and reflexes. Not that that isn't fun sometimes but I think it's a much more individual experience.