Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy
That's fine, but you said trades could only be declined if collusion was suspected. Was collusion suspected here? I'm just trying to figure out which way we are going. Collusion, or the commish doesn't like the trade unless his team benefits, which standard are we going to use?
|
Perhaps you missed my first reply to you here I started my post with
you're right. That's why I pushed the trade through. Do you complain just to read your keystrokes?
I do feel that injury is a different animal and if a guy didn't know that a player just went on IR or was missing the rest of the season, then that's what I was saying. If you don't feel that taking advantage of a guy who didn't know Portis was missing the next 6 weeks or longer was a big deal, then more power to you.