Thread: Football Solving the Redskin Dilemma
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2013, 08:05 AM   #52
Fish Fish is offline
Ain't no relax!
 
Fish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2668919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Color Red View Post
Problem: Political correctness wants Redskins to change their name. Dan Snyder doesn't want to.
You could have just stopped there...

Besides that, the Redskins brand name is worth quite a bit.

Quote:
Forbes assigns $131 million of the Redskins’ $1.6 billion valuation to its brand strength, behind only the Cowboys and Patriots. How much of that brand strength is specifically tied up in the name? It’s impossible to say, exactly. But when you’re minting money even in down years, as the Redskins do, you don’t have much interest in trying to find out. A fresh round of merchandise sales tied to a new identity isn’t worth the risk.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomvanri...ge-their-name/
__________________
Posts: 47,320
Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote