Quote:
Originally Posted by HoneyBadger
Just like someone else said, how do we know who started the fire? By saying it was the police is jumping to conclusions, thus saying the police don't get a "fair trial" about telling their side of how the fire started.
Ehh I'm not a political person. Don't really care. I believe this guy died a death he deserved. Most people deserve a fair trial. He didn't. Their are exceptions for everything, he is an exception.
|
I addressed that point. Those that have already convicted the cops are just as wrong. Circumstantial evidence shouldn't be enough. But I think the fire argument was more a hypothetical than considered concrete. The cops will get their day in court just like the other guy should. Not for his benefit, but for ours. This guy is guilty, but maybe his trial will shine the light on more guilty of other crimes. Really it's not about this guy at all.
But you are correct, those that have already convicted the cops are using a double-standard. I just don't think anyone has. I think some are very suspicious, but I don't think anyone has convicted them yet.