Quote:
Originally Posted by KChiefer
Sorry man but any further testimony by him is forfeit. I'm sure the dildo that held that kid captive recently had a lot to say as well, it needn't be heard. And yeah, offing himself would be a great way to beat thermal detection.
I'm wondering why he didn't go a more serial killer route. So far his grand revenge has killed one cop he doesn't know, two family members of someone he hates, and wounded paperboys. He'd probably see being a serial killer as dishonorable and would risk not getting his manifesto out in the public, but so far the strongest case he's making is "beware psychos."
PS: he did kill one officer yes? I thought he killed one and winged another.
|
It's not about him and it's not about his right to speak truth to power.
It's about his allegations and the possibility that there is truth to them. I want him brought in so we can further dig into the merit of what he's saying for the protection of our citizenry.
Yes, his 'right' to further testify may be forfeit in your eyes, but why should we disregard our right to further investigate? He would be a visible catalyst and someone that would certainly ensure that these investigations take place.
If/when he dies, the investigations will be half-hearted internal reviews that whither up and die.