this is ****ing outrageous
kick returns aside
if Flacco is greater than Manning according to you ****tards
that means Flacco is WAY ****ING BETTER than Tom Brady because the Ravens ****ing anhilated the Patriots AT FOXBORO a week ****ing after the Raven's Rahim Moore'd the Broncos.
The ****ing logic on this site is incredible. Flacco > Manning because Manning beat him but beat him with two kick returns before Rahim Moore made the worst play in NFL history.
But no one says shit about Tom Brady and his terrible third down efficiency in a game against the Ravens where they got ****ING DESTROYED because of the ineptitude of the offense.
Personally, I think Joe Flacco is INCREDIBLY overrated and is simply the "flavor of the week" because he had a good run in the Super Bowl where he DID PLAY GOOD but he's still Joe Flacco and he still is the most inconsistent QB in the NFL.
Yet he's SO MUCH BETTER than brokedick Manning who had that game won SO MUCH that the Broncos elected to run on 3rd and 7 because the game was over...
but Tom Brady isn't even mentioned when Tom Brady played MUCH, MUCH, MUCH worse a week ****ing later against the Ravens where the Patriots lost because they couldn't convert 3rd downs and settled for FG after FG after FG.
I believe Peyton Manning threw for 3 TD passes against the Ravens in the postseason, did he not?
You're all unbelievable when it comes to QB play. This site simply has no ****ing idea what it is watching.
Late 30 year old Manning and Brady are WAY BETTER ****ING QB's than Joe Flacco...and I'd take either of them for 3 years and $60M over Joe Flacco for 6 years and $120M.
Just because Joe Flacco is capable of playing franchise QB a game here in there doesn't excuse the fact that he will play the next game like Mark Sanchez...and in the NFL where EVERY SINGLE GAME MATTERS...that means you're not elite.