Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
And? They are very comparable and Geno most definitely has less talent around him this year than Luck did at Stanford last year. Are you arguing against this?
|
Yes. I think it's ridiculous to compare stats between an aerial offense qb and a pro style offense qb. Stats are irrelevant when evaluating Luck.
Quote:
|
Yep. And there is nothing that I've seen from Geno that says he couldn't. However, apparently, you don't think he would/could. Why don't you believe he could?
|
Could geno succeed in Stanford's offense? Absolutely. Would he have been as successful as Luck? Probably not. Because you are asking a guy to be better than a guy who was the best qb prospect in ten years. And you are asking him to outthink a qb that showed in college he was smarter than most nfl qbs. Geno couldn't. Bradford couldn't. Matt Ryan couldn't. I still believe luck is a once in a generation draft pick.
Quote:
|
And? Did he or didn't he?
|
Don't hide behind your agenda. You are trying to compare geno to luck than pretend that you're not.
Quote:
What agenda?
I want the Chiefs to draft Geno Smith. Period. That's it.
You are the one flipping the **** out because someone mentioned Geno and Luck in the same post. The horse is on the way to the glue factory and you're still attempting to make an issue out of it.
|
Because I hate overhype and I hate demonizing. Something this board does a lot. Your agenda was pretty clear. Luck shouldn't even be in the conversation of comparisons. At all.