[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Maverick91579

The packers the year they won the super bowl, were a complete team in the playoffs. Their defense had as much to do with them winning the super bowl as their offense. The patriots haven't won a super bowl since adding players like randy moss, and wes welker, while losing guys like ty law, lawyer milloy, willie mcginnest. The saints defense also was a major reason they won the super bowl, or do you not remember them knocking out favre, and picking off peyton manning to seal the super bowl? The two most complete teams in football last year played in the super bowl. the most complete team (the giants) won the super bowl before. They were the most balanced teams in football. Now, would you care to tell me how I am wrong again? Lets not forget, that Aaron Rodgers, record breaking MVP season, was the year AFTER they won the super bowl, and he got bounced in the divisionals by the giants. Im not here to troll, or to stir shit up, but the myth that these days all you need is a franchise qb to win is bullshit. you need a complete team.

You can type in bold all you want. It doesn't make you sound any less stupid.

The "myth" of a franchise QB needed to win in this league is a factual reality.