View Single Post
Old 04-23-2013, 04:27 PM   #55
AustinChief AustinChief is offline
Administrator
 
AustinChief's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $29212
Quote:
Originally Posted by La literatura View Post
Here's my position: the 2nd Amendment's traditional meaning was that it was intrinsically tied into the operation of a state militia. You don't think U.S. v. Miller supports that position?

I also don't see why your opinion on the Hughes court is relevant here.
Yes the Miller decision was "militia" based which was wrong to begin with BUT if you read the entire decision they make a concerted effort to broadly define militia and show that the de facto effect of the 2nd Amendment is to allow for every male citizens to legally keep their own arms. While this was an ass backwards way to come to a conclusion that had been accepted all along, it still came to the proper conclusion... one you seem too ****ing stupid to get.
Posts: 18,371
AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote