Quote:
Originally Posted by KCrockaholic
Geno should be our pick still IMO. We need to work him into our new system, whichever that may be. We can't run that stupid ****ing Holgorsen spread in KC. Geno would be a perfect WCO QB IMO. Running a variation of the WCO mixed with a bit of spread would be perfect.
But on a side note, I think the criticism of Mike Glennon is too much. He led a game winning touchdown drive against a top 5 defense in the FBS. Although he played conservative in that game, he loves to stretch the field. He plays under center quite a bit, and sells the play action pretty well.
His intermediate passes are usually pretty accurate, and he's not afraid to take chances downfield unless he's playing Florida State. His pocket awareness needs improvement, as he has been stripped a few times, but Geno is actually one of the worst about getting strip-sacked in the pocket.
Glennon is a late to mid first round guy in my opinion. He's a goofy lookin mother ****er. But I'd rather judge what he looks like with a helmet and pads on. He has some supreme potential.
I still would rather take Geno though. But we better work with him.
|
I agree with this. I don't care what Glennon looks like if he has potential.
Just don't understand why people dog him for his checkdowns when he's playing with D2 WR's that drop the ball 4 times a game. It's like he gets no passes at all but Geno gets every excuse in the world.
We'll see how good he is when he's on a level playing field next month at the Senior Bowl.