Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
C'mon man, don't be a pussy.
You've called Geno's performance "falling flat on his face" and expected an "efficient" game from him, all things considered.
I'd like to know what you would have thought would have been "efficient" with "all things considered."
Let's hear it, versus you trying to weasel out of it.
|
What would've been efficient? Have i NOT stated this enough yet?
0-10 on 3rd down is not efficient.
0-2 on 4th Down is not efficient.
Fumbling the ball in the end zone is not efficient.
taking sacks for safties after your struggling defense gets a takeaway is NOT efficient.
Yes, Geno fell flat on his face. He was expecting to create seperation between he and the next QB. Did he do that? No, he didn't.
The Majority of CP tuned in to see if he could do it. He didn't. If anything, he actually made his case worse. If you don't believe he made it worse, ok fine. But there is no way you could tell me he made it better. In that sense, he failed.
He was GIVEN chances by his atrocious defense and he failed.
How does that = a good performance?
When was the last time you labeld a QB, who's offense went 0-10 on 3rd down and 0-2 and 4th down, efficient?
For the Majority of that game, he and his offense couldn't get anything going. How is that efficient?