Quote:
Originally Posted by Exoter175
NO, I shouldn't have said that. My argument had nothing to do with American workers up until that point, neither did the context of the post.
Just as he shouldn't have said entitled when referencing his Mexicans being cheap in response to mine about the fact that they do not pay for insurance or carry warranties.
A point you've been avoiding this entire time, because if you admit it was said, you lose the debate, to refute the claim that it was said, breeds ignorance of the fact.
Basically, you lost this debate before you posted, because you forget to consider or check the context of the response before you tried to correct me.
You lost bud, sorry.
And if you continue to claim that you've won, I'll repeat again.
Did the OP not reply or acknowledge the reference that Mexicans are cheap because they do not have to carry insurance, or carry a warranty?
Simple yes or no here.
|
Is English your first language? I'll let this all slide if your using Google Translate for all of your posts.
You're slipping and sliding all over the place on this debate. Let me give you an example of what you sound like.
ME: Bluebirds are blue! I hate Bluebirds.
YOU: You obviously don't understand what the word BLUE means.
ME: Um, Bluebirds ARE blue and I don't like them at all.
YOU: You're wrong not to like bluebirds! They are nice birds!
ME: Well they ARE BLUE and no they are mean ass birds.
YOU: Bluebirds are nice to people they are only mean to other birds.. that makes them nice!
KCNATIVE: Um, I think Austinchief is right, bluebirds are blue.
YOU: NOPE he clearly doesn't understand the meaning of the word blue! I proved that when I said they were nice! CONTEXT! DEBATE OVER I WIN!
Did that make any sense? It shouldn't. It follows the same lack of cohesion and logic that your argument does.
Hootie's argument about Mexican workers being cheap had to do with a lack of a sense of entitlement. YOU brought in the lack of overhead. He is free to admit that that is ALSO true but it doesn't invalidate or have ANY bearing on his original point.
AGAIN.. you were WRONG to say he shouldn't use the WORD... you can argue that he was wrong to make the point but it doesn't change the FACT that in CONTEXT he still used the word to correctly convey how he felt. Right or wrong on his point his word choice was fine.