Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724
MW2 was a cluster**** of killstreaks and explosives with little emphasis on gun on gun battles. The only way you could get away from all the BS was to hop into FFA.
If MW3 really does go back to focusing on gun on gun like COD4 did it should be the best one yet. I don't know what you want them to improve on.... I think toning down all the BS from MW2 is a great thing. I mean there were so many OP things in MW2 like Scavenger refilling claymores so nobody had to move, OMA doing the same thing and adding Danger Close and n00btubes was cheap as shit, commando, shotgun secondaries, stacking overpowered killstreaks......
|
They made a new engine for MW2, added a bunch of new perks and loaded up on awesome killstreaks nobody even could imagine. MW2 was the best COD game ever and still is. It was well balanced and just a complete blast to play. MW3 is rehashing MW2. It's more like an expansion pack than a new game.
You say all those things were cheap as shit, yet I made the choice of not using them because I thought other perks and loadouts were more powerful. That was the beauty of it. You expect everyone to play by some stupid rules you have in your head. It's the same "WAAAH WAAAH HE'S USING GHOST" story we've heard from you again. The fact that people chose other perks over Ghost, should tell you that it's not as overpowered as you think, but you just can't get that through your thick little head.