Quote:
Originally Posted by gblowfish
Let's review Dayton Moore for a minute.
He came in for Baird in the middle of 2006. So let's give him 2006 and 2007 as a mulligan.
We'll call his effective reign as KC GM from 2008 to current. That's a five year run.
Here's the Royals record as of July 17th in the last five seasons:
2008: 43-54
2009: 37-52
2010: 39-51
2011: 38-57
2012: 38-50.
Do we see a pattern here? What exactly is the "process?" Looks like the "process" is to make sure the Glass Family makes money. Don't see much change in wins and losses. Do you?
|
Let's look at 2007's roster compared to current roster :
2007 Kansas City Royals
Most Games by Position
C John Buck (112) -
huge upgrade
1B Ross Gload (89) -
upgrade, with big upside
2B Mark Grudzielanek (116) -
Grudz better, but not much
3B Alex Gordon (137) -
Moose is much better
SS Tony Pena (150) -
big upgrade
LF Emil Brown (78) -
Gordon much better
CF David DeJesus (156) -
DeJesus better, but Cain has ability
RF Mark Teahen (137) -
push?
Starting pitching is a push; sucked then and sucks now
SP Brian Bannister
SP Jorge De La Rosa
SP Gil Meche
SP Odalis Perez
Bullpen is better now than 2007, even with Soria on the shelf
RP John Bale
RP Ryan Braun
RP Octavio Dotel
RP Brandon Duckworth
RP Jimmy Gobble
RP Joel Peralta
RP David Riske
CL Joakim Soria
In addition, we have much more promise still sitting in the minors than in 2007.
I'm not an apologist for DM, his leash is getting shorter and I'm as frustrated as anyone. But it has everything to do with an inability to find starting pitching. The win-loss speaks for itself as well, I'm not going to disagree with the importance of simple wins and losses. But we're in a better spot today than when he took over.