View Single Post
Old 12-08-2008, 10:54 AM   #2263
Mark M Mark M is offline
What time is it?
 
Mark M's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: You tell me ...
Casino cash: $9884900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guru View Post
Never tried GT series. I have always sucked at racing games. Especially if they are overly realistic.
GT was great, IMHO, for those not used to it due to their licensing system. It allowed you to get the feel of how to drive in real situations -- a great primer. I also enjoy Forza 2 quite a bit, and it has a number of tweaks that make the game easier (e.g. the racing line super-imposed on the track to guide you).

The main drawbacks I have with the GT series are:

1. Too many Skylines -- Nice car, but dear lord ...
2. Weak AI -- Way too easy most of the time
3. No damage -- If you slam into a wall at 100 MPH, your car should reflect that
4. No paint or custom feature -- What you get is what you got

The main issues I have with Forza 2 are:

1. Not enough cars -- 300 is quite a few, but it could use more
2. Not enough city tracks -- Would love to see a few more city tracks like in GT (Seattle, Monaco, etc.)
3. No tutorial/licensing -- Probably not needed, but would be nice for n00bs.

Overall, they both could use a few more American cars, IMHO. Yes, most U.S. cars are crap when compared to their Japanese and European rivals, but the mid-80s GT Mustangs, Oldsmobile 442, even a stock car or two, could be represented better. And they would be no worse than some of the Jap. and Euro dogs they include.

Anyway, when GT 5 comes out (last I heard Dec. 09), it should be amazing -- I've seen shots of endurance races with 30+ cars on the track! That'd be stunning. And given their love of cars (the biggest difference between the two games, IMHO -- GT celebrates the car, while Forza celebrates the racing), the car list should be a whopper.

MM
~~
__________________
ChiefsPlanet -- n. The place where brilliant minds assemble to willfully pool ignorance with questionable logic in order to reach absurd conclusions.
Posts: 4,687
Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.Mark M is not part of the Right 53.
    Reply With Quote