Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man
I turned on the TV tonight and the 2005 King Kong movie was on. There was some absolutely gorgeous chick who turned out to be Naomi Watts, and a really big gorilla and some dinosaurs, so I was thinking, "Hey, this is promising. I'll check this out."
Adrien Brody showed up and I like him, but then Jack Black showed up, which automatically makes any movie far, far worse. Then about 10 things happened that were astoundingly unrealistic and unbelievable, and the special effects were laughably bad, so now I'm watching NFL Network.
I'm all for suspending belief, and a movie with gorillas fighting dinosaurs doesn't bother me. But when you have graphics that from the 1930s and the stars are making marksman shots that no sniper could make, and Adrien Brody is avoiding death from a creature that just killed a Tyrannosaurus with its bare paws, and people are swinging from vines and leaping onto giant vampire bats hundreds of feet in the air, that pretty much turns me off.
Plus, I watched it for 15 minutes and Naomi Watts didn't get naked once. Who directed this thing?
|
I don't hate King Kong. I mean, it's King Kong so you're going to get that shit.
Perhaps I just like it because Naomi Watts is in it. She is ****ing gorgeous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonGekko
Went to see Snow White and the Huntsman, almost walked, almost... should have.
|
Snow White and the Huntsman was shit. But I think if you replace that worthless bag of nothing Kristen Stewart, you have a passable film. I was real apprehensive about seeing Snow White. Overall, the graphics and fight scenes were decent, Charlize Theron did pretty well, because she can actually act a little, and I thought Hemsworth gave an excellent performance. ****ing excellent.
All that was demolished by the black hole that is the void of any acting talent or on screen persona or even hotness that is Kristen Stewart.
BTW This was the first movie I'd seen her in.