Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish
You're welcome to post your own examples of this misinformation. I'd love to see some of these scientific studies disproving the ones I've posted. Everybody keeps talking about the differing studies and and how they're all biased. But I'm not seeing many scientific studies supporting what you're claiming.
You're taking 8+ supplements, according to your post. Surely you have some proof of what they do other than personal feeling.
|
You bet, I have done a ton of research over the years and have met with doctors I highly respect to take what I do. The research behind the benefits of ubiquinol alone on a cellular level are well documented. You can wiki it you want to scratch the surface but I am not going to go back and try to dig up every bit of documentation I have ever come across over the decades to validate each supp I take. Even that goofy chart posted earlier has most of what I take at the very top. If you don't already know the well documented benefits of what I take then you're friggen reeruned to begin with and it doesn't matter what you try and find to validate a contrarian position.
Some of you may need to be a bit older but lets look back at the crock of shit we have been sold over the years by our scientific community.
Most of you won't remember the controvery around glandulars of testosterone boost over 30 years ago but we were told it was crap that didn't work. I guess additonal zits, size increases and aggression must have been the placebo effect.
How about the demonization C and much more recently D-3?
How about when our
scientific community tried to outlaw all supplentation period without a prescription. Anybody remember that one from like 1996 or so. Yea they don't work and it's all a hoax but you can still get them through big pharm with a prescription from your doctor. What a ****ing joke that was.
More recently their was the whole demonization of test and HGH wich has moved over to big money now as well. The
scientific community was all behind that one.