[Mav]

Originally Posted by qbsacker93

It's the skeptics who are out researching and coming up with valid points, and having real debate and discussions about every detail on their team. The true fans could give a shit less, half of them are there just for the beer and bbq. A great fanbase needs a healthy dose of both. Too far one way, and you are the Chiefs fanbase. Too far the other way, and you suddenly become the Jets. I like being right, so I go with what my research tells me. Same thing with Matt Cassel, when he was sacked a ton of times in NE and his receivers lead the league in YAC, I knew he would be exposed with a less talented team. I foresee the same with Smith.

again. A less talented team? This will be the most talented offense that alex smith has ever been apart of. Can anyone truthfully debate that with me? I mean, for sure, ill gladly debate that point.

Originally Posted by mcaj22

what have the skeptics been wrong about so far?

Scooter?
Cassel?
Haley?
Romeo?
Bill Muir?
Brian Daboll?
Stanford Routt?
Zach Thomas?
Peyton Hillis?


literally pick someone. Anyone. Baldwin? Tony Moeaki? the list goes on and on.

And yet, not a single person on that list, is on this team, nor had any affiliation with the current regiment, which in fact invalidates anybodies assumption that this is the same old same old.

Originally Posted by mcaj22

the Treen Green/Rich Gannon comparisons are literally what you hope and pray Alex Smith is for a ceiling. Some 30-37 year old window where he plays lights out and has a career resurgence.

I mean, it's really rare for that to happen to a QB. How many can you name? Gannon? Green? Who else had a good late career. Kurt Warner probably counts in there too.

You are basically saying Alex Smith might compare to 3 guys that are such a rare case at the QB position, and if he ends up being as good as them, probability states he should carry us to a Super Bowl, like Gannon and Warner did.

That's just way too much hypothetical with such a rare percentage of it panning out.

Well sure. I mean absolutely, because Alex Smith was unimpressive the past 20 starts of his career. He proved with proven coaching that at the very least, he will always give your team a chance to win. He had less turnovers in the past two years than the chiefs qbs had last season alone. He had success, he has had proven success over the past two years. Things that people don't want to acknowledge, or give him credit for at the very least, being a part of, which, he was. He was an integral part of the success the 49ers had, if you don't want to say in 2012, fine, but in 2011, he was a huge part of that.

Originally Posted by qbsacker93

Won't happen. Alexsexuals need a place to defend their golden boy. Haters need a place to trash Smith. I think it's a healthy outlet.

What is there to defend? Over the last two seasons he proved that he is ultra precise, ultra conservative, and a true leader, on and off the field. That REALLY needs defending. Mean while, the qb who won the last super bowl, didn't throw 30 tds, he threw 28, and he didn't have 4000 yards. If anything the argument that conservative offense that relies on the running game, and occasional big play, solid defense and special teams is actually the formula that has won the past two super bowls. yet, people think that this is a plan for MEDIOCRITY, while teams like the packers, saints, pats, have either not made the playoffs, or lost to one of those two teams the past two years while having qbs that threw for over 5000 yards.

Like I said. What exactly do Alexsexuals need to defend?

Originally Posted by ptlyon

He's got a better chance at getting pregnant

Lol, yes, because more throws, will amount to more ints, but DEFINTELY NOT MORE TOUCHDOWNS........Do people realize that his season high for TDS, was 18 in 2009, and yet, he didn't start the first 7 games of the season, but for sure, him getting to 25, IMPOSSIBLE. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha