Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!
I know very, very few photographers that have that kind of gear. Unless he's getting into it professionally, no one needs to spend that kind of money. And it'd be silly to spend that for him. He could spend $1,000 on body and lens and have a camera that would well past his needs for the next 15 years.
I just spent $300 of a 50mm fixed f/1.8 Canon lens, and I've been thrilled with it. No, at f/2.8 it's not as sharp on their L-series, but I don't shoot at f/2.8 that often. At f/4.0 it's one of the sharpest lenses I've used, including some of the L-series.
|
Whatever works for you.
I shoot professionally so I can only speak of what I know.
Hell a major wire or sports agency won't even talk to a photographer unless they have certain equipment.
That's why I have to have it.
You can get by with a lot less.