View Single Post
Old 01-02-2013, 02:07 AM   #188
Exoter175 Exoter175 is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $10003166
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC View Post
Branden Albert said he wants to stay in KC, and Pioli won't have say in the decisions.

It's up to Geno to keep his value in the top 10. Just hope he doesn't shit the bed at the Senior Bowl or Combine.

1 of these QB's will be a top 10 talent and it's probably going to be Geno or Wilson.
I'm going to say right now that it is Geno, but Wilson and Bray will give him a run for the money, but I do not think there will be two QB's taken in the top 10, and if it does happen, we're talking #9 or #10 itself. I don't see many QB's taken in the late round either, as most of them have young QB's from the last 5 years of drafting, both in terms of starters and backups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre View Post
Personally, I've invested a shitload of time watching a lot of different QBs and developed a QB big board that is twelve deep. I watch a lot of games live and a lot of youtube snap-by-snaps since I don't have the luxury of coaches film. Sac also puts in a lot of time watching and doing research. I think you might be a little out of your depth with some of your remarks there.
Who is to say I don't do the same, or more? Are you in fact a scout for the NFL? You didn't answer that question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR View Post
Uhh... are you a ****ing idiot?




His response is right ****ing there.

If you want to play that game at QB, why not play it with the OTHER positions. Because in this particular draft, there are really no guys that separate themselves from the pack for ANY of the positions besides defensive line and pass rusher.

If all things are equal for the ILBs, why not take a guy in the 2nd and take a QB in the first?

If all things are equal for the OTs, why not take a guy in the 2nd and take a QB in the first?

For some goddamn reason with you it has to be the QB position that gets the shaft, and talent is settled for later on.

****ing why the **** would you do that you ****ing idiot?
Idiot, no. Genius level IQ, yes. And his response wasn't right there, as it did not fit the question I asked, go back and read it over again. I made the point clear that both I and the rest of the talking heads believe the QB cluster**** to be a tossup, and the LB position is not a cluster****, there are guys out there that have separated, Te'o is one of them. At least in my eyes, and those of the professionals, for now. Again as I stated ****ing years ago now, we've yet to see Senior Bowls, Pro Days, and a Combine, which is where all of this changes.

As for the last bit, I'm not shafting Talent at the QB level really, if they are all the same, if they are all literally at a tie, why the **** would I EVER IN MY LIFE take one with the first pick of the draft, if there is a position of need that has separated himself from the rest, knowing I can get THE EXACT SAME PRODUCT at QB in the 2nd, rather than the first?

I wouldn't be shafting talent if they are all equal, now would I? ERMAHGERD THERT MERKS SCERNTS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo View Post
You just did you ****ing moron.



Hmmm...

Let's take a look at three possible outcomes come draft day:

1. Geno Smith in the first and Kevin Minter in the second.

2. Manti Te'o in the first and, say, Ryan Nassib or Mike Glennon in the second.

3. Luke Joeckel in the first and trade our second for Alex Smith.

I think I'll go with door number one, Bob. That's two Day 1 high level starters. Yes please.

I just did what? There wasn't really a structure in there to make that remark with..........lol

If you really think Nassib/Glennon is our option with our 2nd round draft pick, you are putting far too much "need" for QB's going into this draft for the teams in the NFL lol. Also, go ahead and put Bray in as the #4 guy ahead of Nassib, Glennon, and Murray, if you have Murray ahead of him.

That being said, if my option is Te'o in the first and Wilson/Bray/Smith/Barkley in the 2nd, I'd rather that, RIGHT NOW (qualifying word, be careful) than Smith and Minter/Ogletree.

Emphasis on RIGHT NOW, since that is the qualifying word in that sentence and everything is subject and likely to change after the combine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR View Post
Manti Te'o isn't this prized treasure that every defense needs. He's not a once-in-a-lifetime player. He's not ****ing Ray Lewis. I don't know why the hell you think he is.

He's ****ing not.

Because I think a lot of people here on CP undervalue him because all they want to look at is a QB right now.

And to be honest, that is a completely justifiable reason to make that statement, because if you take a step back right now, all this forum is about is QB's right now, we don't give a **** what else is going on with this roster, QB is the only position we care about. Not the contracts/lack of contracts for Bowe, Albert, Colquitt, much more important players right now than which of 5 QB's we take in this draft who haven't managed to really separate themselves yet.

Shameful really, collectively we are all so narrow minded and focused on Geno that we have lost interest elsewhere.
Posts: 2,327
Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.Exoter175 would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote