View Single Post
Old 03-10-2010, 12:43 AM   #5483
58kcfan89 58kcfan89 is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Casino cash: $10003187
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc View Post
They pulled a 1.4 on a Monday night two months ago. So that argument doesn't hold very much water.

Russo's tried to make Sting a heel before. It's never, ever worked. Maybe it will this time. Either way, his 5-minute beatdown of RVD was one of the stupidest things I've ever seen. Next to not advertising that RVD was going to be on the show in the first place. Or Jeff Hardy. Or cutting the broadcast off right before the swanton on AJ. Or not having Samoa Joe on at all.


I really want TNA to work. They have a really talented roster and I think legitimate competition would be good for WWE. But TNA is doomed as long as the same guys (the writing staff, Russo and friends) are putting the shows together. They've shown over and over and over and over that they just don't have a clue. The thing I'm most worried about right now is that the move to Monday night will kill the company.
RVD was on TNA? WTF?!??!!!!

I still haven't seen Raw or Impact this week (stupid midterms), but I'll probably download them & skip to the parts I want to see later this week...
Posts: 2,252
58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.58kcfan89 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.
    Reply With Quote