Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan
we could have traded out of 3 and got way more value than just jackson at three thats my point
|
100% agree there. I would have traded back for half of the normal value with NO HESITATION.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
First off, you're misconstruing what I said so I'll say it again:
A QB (you know, the guy that's most responsible for wins and losses on a football team?) is MORE VALUABLE than a 5-Tech, 3-4 defensive end.
Got it?
I'm not going to argue your "opinion" of Freeman vs. my "opinion" of Tyson Jackson.
The bottom line is that all things being equal, a QB is infinitely more valuable to ANY franchise than a 3-4, 5 tech DE.
Got it?
|
Please, dont talk down to me. I understand everything posted in this thread fully. Just because your opinion differs from mine, doesn't mean you have to try to be condescending to puff yourself up. Im sure you have the respect of most posters here and it is unnecessary. Save it for more deserving posters. There are plenty here to choose from.
I agree 100% that the QB position is far more valuable than a 5-tec. BUT if you dont feel that the available qbs can be the answer, you dont just take one to take one. That is what ultimately dooms franchises for five or more years.
"I'm not going to argue your "opinion" of Freeman vs. my "opinion" of Tyson Jackson."
Then this is a dead issue. What fun is it to say "you are wrong, but Im not gonna talk about why"
Ty Warrren is far more valuable to a team than Kyle Boller would be.
Got it?
I find that I am in these debates often and people hopefully arent thinking I am happy about the pick, just that is isnt as bad as some make it out to be.