CHIEFS SB DROUGHT RANT - Page 4

HC_Chief · 01-23-2006, 09:44 AM

With Seattle going to the SB this year, it makes this stat official: EVERY SINGLE AFCW TEAM OTHER THAN THE KC CHIEFS HAS HAD AT LEAST ONE SUPERBOWL APPEARANCE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF CARL PETERSON'S TENURE.

True, Seattle is now in the NFC, but they were AFCW when Peterson took the wheel.

In the same time period only Detroit and New Orleans have been as pathetic, playoff-wise.

So CP gets a fat new contract? Where do I apply for this job? Requirements: behave like a conceited ass, bray about ticket sales, continually increase parking and ticket prices, denegrate the media and fanbase, get PAID, and worry not about results on the field. Think I could do that for a cool $mil, or four.

Simplex3 · 01-23-2006, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter

"but they'll move" in 3...2...1...

**Smed1065** · 01-23-2006, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Carl told me that they would hold the interviews at Arrowhead to give the impression that he did care. It's all part of his master plot to trick those fans who really know that Lamar doesnt care about them to spend their money anyway on the Chiefs.

The only reason they are being held at Arrowhead is so they can charge you for parking!

greg63 · 01-24-2006, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

The only problem I have with that theory, if you want to call it that, is that it's been FIFTEEN years.

Is Lamar really that gullible? Or is the money/sales enough to offset the disappointment when it comes to winning?

Yup.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefsos

Here ya go, fire away. Credits to George Blowfish for the pic, though you can sub one of your choice.

http://www.netdisaster.com/go.php?mo...geQuality=Full

I love it!

Calcountry · 01-24-2006, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover

Um if we were in the NFC we would have also been able to play their shitty teams as well.

NYG, and DAL were good teams in the NFC, Philly when we played them where still good, and we should have won all of those games.

Yeah, just look at how good Chigago did in that conference.

Calcountry · 01-24-2006, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HMc

Rhetoric. What motivates Lamar, we are never going to know. But a 17 year tenure (and counting) for the GM which includes one trip to the AFC championship game and bugger all else, suggests to me that Hunt has other priorites. Or that he'd like a SB win but he's not prepared to forego the status quo of winning season after winning season to get one.

I'm not saying that the coaches and players don't work their guts out each and every season.

Or, he thinks it is all just luck when you get to the playoff level anyway, and we have just had dumb luck.

And spending a few more million dollars wouldn't guarantee anything anyway, so why waste the money.

01-23-2006, 09:44 AM
HC_Chief That's just f***in' stupid Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: suburbia Casino cash: $3687107	CHIEFS SB DROUGHT RANT With Seattle going to the SB this year, it makes this stat official: EVERY SINGLE AFCW TEAM OTHER THAN THE KC CHIEFS HAS HAD AT LEAST ONE SUPERBOWL APPEARANCE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF CARL PETERSON'S TENURE. True, Seattle is now in the NFC, but they were AFCW when Peterson took the wheel. In the same time period only Detroit and New Orleans have been as pathetic, playoff-wise. So CP gets a fat new contract? Where do I apply for this job? Requirements: behave like a conceited ass, bray about ticket sales, continually increase parking and ticket prices, denegrate the media and fanbase, get PAID, and worry not about results on the field. Think I could do that for a cool $mil, or four.
Posts: 12,355