If Okung and Bulaga are off the board... - Page 3

Saccopoo · 03-11-2010, 04:51 PM

1. Bradford
2. Okung
3. Suh
4. Bulaga
5. ?

I was thinking that Berry would be the logical pick, but just can't imagine Pioli pulling the trigger on a safety this early without looking at other possibilities.

I think it comes down to the following players:

Trent Williams, OT; Oklahoma
Gerald McCoy, DT; Oklahoma
Eric Berry, S; Tennessee

Dorsey was in Haley's dog house to start summer camp and doesn't necessarily fit the profile for a prototype five technique defensive end in a 3-4 scheme. McCoy would be very enticing to a team that had no problem using the third pick in the draft on Jackson, who is playing the seven tech/LDE for the Chiefs.

Williams showed some excellent athleticism at the combine and has the potential to anchor the offensive line at either the RT or LT spot. Albert has been mediocre and inconsistent at best. Wade Smith and Andy Alleman are no longer Chiefs. It's not a reach to think that they would draft Williams and put Albert in at guard - a position he played and excelled at in college.

Berry is an immediate upgrade to the Chiefs defensive backfield. However, he does play a position that typically doesn't have the positional value of others in terms of being a high draft pick. It comes down to the Chiefs believing that he actually is an Ed Reed clone and if that position in the 3-4 scheme is relevant to such a high pick.

Jerm · 03-11-2010, 07:39 PM

Pioli should be fired on the spot if we pass on Berry at #5 for anyone...

If we pass on Berry for Trent ****ing Williams, ill nuke One Arrowhead Drive on the spot...

This is ridiculous...
Posted via Mobile Device

Crush · 03-11-2010, 09:21 PM

I like Milkman's nickname for Sac, Okung's Sac.
Posted via Mobile Device

Crush · 03-11-2010, 09:25 PM

Seriously, Clausen should be the pick there.
Posted via Mobile Device

Saccopoo · 03-11-2010, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I have no idea what this thread's actually about, cause I have saccopoo on ignore...

I can't imagine how incomplete your life must be...how devoid of intellectualism and wit and humor and introspection and overall awesomeness your existence is...like you've been sucked into a black hole of sadness and pain and longing.

Come back to the light keg.

If I have offended you, it most certainly wasn't intended. Don't take things so personally. We're all here for the same purpose, the same reason, the same passion and joy and love.

It'll be okay buddy. I promise.

**BossChief** · 03-11-2010, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

I can't imagine how incomplete your life must be...how devoid of intellectualism and wit and humor and introspection and overall awesomeness your existence is...like you've been sucked into a black hole of sadness and pain and longing.

Come back to the light keg.

If I have offended you, it most certainly wasn't intended. Don't take things so personally. We're all here for the same purpose, the same reason, the same passion and joy and love.

It'll be okay buddy. I promise.

Are you dumb enough to think he will see that if he does in fact have your dumbass on ignore?

Sorry, forgot who I was talking to.

Carry on Okungssac

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 03-11-2010, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

What's more important - an offensive tackle (right or left, it doesn't matter) or a safety?

A right tackle at 5............................

keg in kc · 03-11-2010, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

Are you dumb enough to think he will see that if he does in fact have your dumbass on ignore?

Sorry, forgot who I was talking to.

Carry on Okungssac

Apparently he is dumb enough. I would have never seen that if you hadn't quoted him.

As for offending me, he's never offended me that I can recall. I just think his posts are a waste of time. So I don't read them.

I think it might triple the IQ of the board as a whole.

Saccopoo · 03-11-2010, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

Are you dumb enough to think he will see that if he does in fact have your dumbass on ignore?

Sorry, forgot who I was talking to.

Carry on Okungssac

I knew that one of you nitwits would repost it. You can be my messenger boy any time you want Boss.

KCrockaholic · 03-11-2010, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

A right tackle at 5............................

Yeah but we are gonna be getting that left handed QB soon ya know!

Saccopoo · 03-12-2010, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

Yeah but we are gonna be getting that left handed QB soon ya know!

You are a brilliant, brilliant man kcrock. I was thinking the same thing myself:

Trent Williams in the first, to protect our left handed QBOTF who we pick up with our first second round selection.

KCrockaholic · 03-12-2010, 12:16 AM

Haha. Alright. That's not what I meant but, It's not like I will be pissed if we draft Tebow, but he isn't exactly on my radar either. I like the guy a lot.

milkman · 03-13-2010, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admiral Crunch

I like Milkman's nickname for Sac, Okung's Sac.
Posted via Mobile Device

I believe Okung's sac just shot his load with this draft scenario.

Saccopoo · 03-13-2010, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

Haha. Alright. That's not what I meant but, It's not like I will be pissed if we draft Tebow, but he isn't exactly on my radar either. I like the guy a lot.

If you're saying that a combination of Trent Williams/Tim Tebow offers a more "attractive" long term alternative to Albert/Cassel I think that you might have some degree of substance to such a hypothetical situation.

03-11-2010, 04:51 PM
Saccopoo Kindness in words... Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Zion Casino cash: $10025483	If Okung and Bulaga are off the board... 1. Bradford 2. Okung 3. Suh 4. Bulaga 5. ? I was thinking that Berry would be the logical pick, but just can't imagine Pioli pulling the trigger on a safety this early without looking at other possibilities. I think it comes down to the following players: Trent Williams, OT; Oklahoma Gerald McCoy, DT; Oklahoma Eric Berry, S; Tennessee Dorsey was in Haley's dog house to start summer camp and doesn't necessarily fit the profile for a prototype five technique defensive end in a 3-4 scheme. McCoy would be very enticing to a team that had no problem using the third pick in the draft on Jackson, who is playing the seven tech/LDE for the Chiefs. Williams showed some excellent athleticism at the combine and has the potential to anchor the offensive line at either the RT or LT spot. Albert has been mediocre and inconsistent at best. Wade Smith and Andy Alleman are no longer Chiefs. It's not a reach to think that they would draft Williams and put Albert in at guard - a position he played and excelled at in college. Berry is an immediate upgrade to the Chiefs defensive backfield. However, he does play a position that typically doesn't have the positional value of others in terms of being a high draft pick. It comes down to the Chiefs believing that he actually is an Ed Reed clone and if that position in the 3-4 scheme is relevant to such a high pick.
Posts: 15,450

03-11-2010, 07:39 PM	#31
Jerm Mahomes > God Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $4428996	Pioli should be fired on the spot if we pass on Berry at #5 for anyone... If we pass on Berry for Trent ***ing Williams, ill nuke One Arrowhead Drive on the spot... This is ridiculous... Posted via Mobile Device*
Posts: 10,218

03-11-2010, 09:21 PM	#32
Crush Amateur Poster Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $2307091	I like Milkman's nickname for Sac, Okung's Sac. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 15,298

03-11-2010, 09:25 PM	#33
Crush Amateur Poster Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $2307091	Seriously, Clausen should be the pick there. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 15,298

03-12-2010, 12:16 AM	#41
KCrockaholic Sarcasm Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $3362900	Haha. Alright. That's not what I meant but, It's not like I will be pissed if we draft Tebow, but he isn't exactly on my radar either. I like the guy a lot.
Posts: 21,179