|
|
View Poll Results: Should coaches have the option to challenge bad calls? | |||
Yes, they should be allowed to challenge bad penality calls. | 37 | 41.57% | |
No, they shouldn't and you are stupid to ask. | 20 | 22.47% | |
Yes, they should... But the NFL will never allow them to. | 38 | 42.70% | |
I have nothing to add. | 5 | 5.62% | |
Don't know, I haven't watched football since my Gaz-stric bypass surgery. | 1 | 1.12% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-22-2010, 07:26 AM | #31 |
Space Cadet and Aczabel
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kanab, UT, USA
Casino cash: $9333275
VARSITY
|
I said yes but only with the stipulation that the number and type be extremely limited.
__________________
Thanks, Trump for the civics lesson. We are learning so much about RICO, espionage, sedition, impeachment, the 25th Amendment, order of succession, nepotism, separation of powers, 1st Amendment, obstruction of justice, the emoluments clause, conflicts of interest, collusion, sanctions, oligarchs, money laundering and so much more. |
Posts: 40,584
|
10-22-2010, 07:29 AM | #32 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2007
Casino cash: $8033688
|
They can't even make the correct call on a lot of plays that are currently reviewable.
__________________
Mismanaging the clock. |
Posts: 22,345
|
10-22-2010, 07:53 AM | #33 | |
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $3525085
|
Quote:
And thanks to our big ass HDTVs and slow motion replays, we KNOW exactly what they're doing wrong, because we're seeing the same thing they see. |
|
Posts: 119,439
|
10-22-2010, 07:58 AM | #34 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Quote:
But what if they didn't change anything and simply kept it to 3 challenges. Just challenge whatever you want. I'm coming around to the idea. |
|
Posts: 5,747
|
10-22-2010, 08:08 AM | #35 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
If a player is headed to the sidelines, and is oinly a couple of feet inbounds, miles awy from the play, with his back to the action, clearly not a factor in any way, that should be ignored. Flagging a team in that sitiation is just ****ing stupid. As to the original question, no, PI should not be reviewable. However, since they **** it so often, and are more inconsistent with that than just about any other, the NFL needs to adopt the college rule, which only gives the the offense 15 yards, rather than a spot foul, because it is such a game changing penalty as it stands. The other rule that needs to be changed is the defensive holding call. Should be a 10 yard penalty, rather than 5 yards, but not an automatic first down. That is a game changing penalty, as well.
__________________
|
|
Posts: 70,769
|
10-22-2010, 09:36 AM | #36 |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Refresh
__________________
|
Posts: 70,769
|
10-22-2010, 09:43 AM | #37 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $3505047
|
Quote:
I'm tired of seeing teams hurry up to the ball to snap it because they know that one of the defensive players isn't completely off of the field yet. |
|
Posts: 91,712
|
10-22-2010, 01:24 PM | #38 |
Bolly 'wood'
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gardner,KS
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 630
|
10-22-2010, 07:39 PM | #39 |
Cheaterlover*
Join Date: May 2009
Location: RI
Casino cash: $10010716
|
So someone say again how big-league sports shouldn't have thorough replay via technical abilities instead of old ****s with bad eyesight? If the Rangers lose this game by a run and then lose Game 7? How the **** does the ump and crew NOT SEE THE ****ING BALL BOUNCE OFF HIS ****ING SHIN?!? Utter bullshit.
|
Posts: 12,916
|
10-22-2010, 09:44 PM | #40 |
(Sir/Yes Sir/Aye Aye Sir)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Diving
Casino cash: $3845380
|
You should get as many reviews as you need to improve the game... And, if you catch officials making more than two bads calls per game, you should be able to have them removed for cause (we'll call it "having a bad day evidently").. If it's able to be shown (QED!!!), then let it be so. Heck, I think if you can prove that some O limeman was holding on a play, you should be able to do it, and have the laundry thrown after the fact. Far too many TD's come after a hold. And if there's a hold on every play, then call it on every play - sooner or later they'll stop!!
__________________
. #President Trump loves and supports the constitution #McCarthy is a Sellout and Traitor to America #The FBLieIsCorrupt #DefundTheFBI #The FBI Is Not The Police #PresidentBidenIsMoronic #LizCheneyGotTheBoot #FJB #80,000,000 Mules (and a few Americans too) Voted For COVID To Continue #I still don't have COVID |
Posts: 114,965
|
10-22-2010, 09:44 PM | #41 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
The idea that it would slow down the game is a joke. It's already a slow game. Install replay, put the pictcher on a clock, limit the number of times the catcher or other position players can visit the mound, keep the batter in the batter's box, limit pick off attempts, and you fix the game.
__________________
|
|
Posts: 70,769
|
10-22-2010, 09:52 PM | #42 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $3584169
|
Human error part of the game my ass... Just imagine a scenario that the Chiefs FINALLY make it back to the Superbowl. The opponents down by 5 with seconds on the clock and have to have a TD to win. The opponent goes for a bomb with Berry and Flowers in perfect coverage. The WR pushes off, scores the winning TD, and the flag's on us.... Yeah, I'de be ectatic that human error should be allowed to be part of the game. FUG that... If player screw up, they're fined or possibly cut. The ref's shouldn't be the exception to the rule.
__________________
|
Posts: 4,626
|
10-22-2010, 10:17 PM | #43 |
Homer go crazy!!!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Kansas
Casino cash: $9374990
|
'Nough said. |
Posts: 17,546
|
10-23-2010, 01:35 AM | #44 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Joe
Casino cash: $10004900
|
My vote points to Yes.
Why?, I've seen too many interference calls that shouldn't be. I know this would make the game longer and we'd have another Coors Light commercial to sit through, yet the correct call would be made... fairly. |
Posts: 36,287
|
10-24-2010, 12:31 PM | #45 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Joe
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Idiot mistakes by blind officials emphasizes my need for reviews on penalties. |
|
Posts: 36,287
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|