|
![]() |
#2 |
Now you've pissed me off!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $7159572
|
Light workload would be 22-26 touches for LJ.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln |
Posts: 75,082
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Beloved & Awesome CP Celebrity
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Florida
Casino cash: $5604952
|
Don't listen to Herm. I'd be shocked if LJ gets anything less than 18 carries.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 35,714
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
offense > defense
Join Date: Jul 2005
Casino cash: $-716668
|
20 to LJ for 90 yards, 10 to Bennet for 50 yards and a token carry to Kolby Smith for -4 yards.
Seems like a good split to me. |
Posts: 9,016
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Go Chiefs!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $914270
|
If you have to ask I guess you'll be in trouble this week. If you are even considering starting both you must not have a very good team.
__________________
Never be satisfied with what you achieve, because it all pales in comparison with what you are capable of doing in the future. |
Posts: 2,964
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Wait Is Over
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Random Small Town
Casino cash: $-701022
|
LJ will get plenty of work and all goaline chances(if any).
|
Posts: 6,219
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
**** That Noise
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jack Trice
Casino cash: $3046954
|
I would start LJ and not Bennett, shouldn't even be a question.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 15,125
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Keep It on Wax
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BUMP MASTER, USA
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I'd go with LJ, plus depends on how deep the league is and how many RB's start.
|
Posts: 2,588
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
You Sweetie!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2021206219
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 71,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2003
Casino cash: $6085286
|
I think LJ will be ready to go. It seems to me like he still has something to prove.
|
Posts: 17,045
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Thigpen's America
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Well, I'm starting LJ and Brandon Jacobs, so... I'm feeling pretty good about it. Also, I have Drew Brees. CHAMPIONSHIP!
|
Posts: 25,680
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ozarks
Casino cash: $-449436
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 34,857
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 11,661
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
The 23rd Pillar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Casino cash: $10019237
|
Which 2 should I start:
LJ, Cedric Benson, Brandon Jacobs
__________________
![]() “Boy, you all want power. God, I hope you never get it.” - Lindsay Graham |
Posts: 110,871
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
u b illian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DooDah
Casino cash: $10009436
|
SportsRacer: LJ, still don't think Bennett is start worthy, though it depends on your options. More info?
patteeu: LJ and Jacobs, Dallas' D has some issues. |
Posts: 7,287
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|