Facebook hires PR firm to plant negative stories about Google

[DaFace]

I don't know whether to or about this.

http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/12/fac...ear-on-google/

Facebook Loses Much Face In Secret Smear On Google
30digg
179 Comments
Michael Arrington
14 hours ago

Facebook secretly hired a PR firm to plant negative stories about Google, says Dan Lyons in a jaw dropping story at the Daily Beast.

For the past few days, a mystery has been unfolding in Silicon Valley. Somebody, it seems, hired Burson-Marsteller, a top public-relations firm, to pitch anti-Google stories to newspapers, urging them to investigate claims that Google was invading people’s privacy. Burson even offered to help an influential blogger write a Google-bashing op-ed, which it promised it could place in outlets like The Washington Post, Politico, and The Huffington Post.

The plot backfired when the blogger turned down Burson’s offer and posted the emails that Burson had sent him. It got worse when USA Today broke a story accusing Burson of spreading a “whisper campaign” about Google “on behalf of an unnamed client.”

Not good.

The source emails are here.

I’ve been patient with Facebook over the years as they’ve had their privacy stumbles. They’re forging new ground, and it’s not an exaggeration to say they’re changing the world’s notions on what privacy is. Give them time. They’ll figure it out eventually.

But secretly paying a PR firm to pitch bloggers on stories going after Google, even offering to help write those stories and then get them published elsewhere, is not just offensive, dishonest and cowardly. It’s also really, really dumb. I have no idea how the Facebook PR team thought that they’d avoid being caught doing this.

First, it lets the tech world know that Facebook is scared enough of what Google’s up to to pull a stunt like this. Facebook isn’t supposed to be scared, ever, about anything. Supreme confidence in their destiny is the the way they should be acting.

Second, it shows a willingness by Facebook to engage in cowardly behavior in battle. It’s hard to trust them on other things when we know they’ll engage in these types of campaigns.

And third, some of these criticisms of Google are probably valid, but it doesn’t matter any more. The story from now on will only be about how Facebook went about trying to secretly smear Google, and got caught.

The truth is Google is probably engaging in some somewhat borderline behavior by scraping Facebook content, and are almost certainly violating Facebook’s terms and conditions. But many people argue, me included, that the key data, the social graph, really should belong to the users, not Facebook. And regardless, users probably don’t mind that this is happening at all. It’s just Facebook trying to protect something that it considers to be its property.

Next time Facebook should take a page from Google’s playbook when they want to trash a competitor. Catch them in the act and then go toe to toe with them, slugging it out in person. Right or wrong, no one called Google a coward when they duped Bing earlier this year.

You’ve lost much face today, Facebook.

[Simplex3]

Of the current large tech companies I trust Facebook the least. Less even than Microsoft.

[jjjayb]

How do we know Google didn't hire Burson-Marsteller to make it look like Facebook was doing this?

[Sofa King]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

How do we know Google didn't hire Burson-Marsteller to make it look like Facebook was doing this?

[AndChiefs]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

How do we know Google didn't hire Burson-Marsteller to make it look like Facebook was doing this?

Or maybe Microsoft hired Burson-Marsteller to make it look like Facebook did it. That way the negative stuff about Google gets out and Facebook takes the fall.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

How do we know Google didn't hire Burson-Marsteller to make it look like Facebook was doing this?

Well, both Burston-Marsteller and Facebook have both come out and said, "Yep, it's true." So there's that.

Or maybe they're being like Al Quaeda and pretending like OBL is dead only so they can secretly plot their next move while we're all thrown off their trail.

[Huffmeister]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Well, both Burston-Marsteller and Facebook have both come out and said, "Yep, it's true." So there's that.

Or maybe they're being like Al Quaeda and pretending like OBL is dead only so they can secretly plot their next move while we're all thrown off their trail.

That's just what they WANT you to believe.

[SuperChief]

We all know the culprit:



Rat bastard.

[Simply Red]

Originally Posted by Simplex3

Of the current large tech companies I trust Facebook the least. Less even than Microsoft.

yeah - that's a pretty dirty attempted torpedo - **** FB