It's been said before but I'm honestly currious start Stanzi??

[chiefscafan]

Stanzi posts have been on here but I'm currious do you start him now? Or do you stick with cassel and see if he can turn it around?


Now more than ever this is becoming a reality.

[ToxSocks]

Palko has to fail before Stanzi gets a start. Forget about it. It's not happening.

[chiefscafan]

Palko is a bigger joke than cassel!

What if we are bad enough to get luck do we draft him though we aren't sure what stanzi can do??

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Palko has to fail before Stanzi gets a start. Forget about it. It's not happening.

Good start with that throw yesterday.

[SPchief]

This has never been discussed

[tooge]

You don't start him. He'd be waaay over his head, particularly with the running game crutch being broken and gone now. Let Cassel get beat up. BUT, he should be the back up, not Palko. At least bring him in for mop up time and let him get reps in this offense. His being inactive while a loser with no future with the team is trotted out there as the back up is ridiculous. This is telling the fan base that you know you are a few years away and there isn't any point in getting Stanzi rocked right now.

[Frosty]

Originally Posted by chiefscafan

Stanzi posts have been on here but I'm currious do you start him now? Or do you stick with cassel and see if he can turn it around?


Now more than ever this is becoming a reality.

Stick with Cassel. You don't want to accidentally win a game.

[stevieray]

...you are talking about a franchise that plays the loyalty card straight to mediocrity.

[Pants]

Dude is a rookie ****ing quarterback who had no off season. That's probably why.

[Jewish Rabbi]

At least when we're winning, threads that are as stupid as this one don't piss me off.

[The Franchise]

No Charles? **** that. I want to watch Cassel fail all season long. I want him to throw for 9 TDs and 50 INTs.

[Window Licking Whiner]

Originally Posted by Pants

Dude is a rookie ****ing quarterback who had no off season. That's probably why.

Judging by the way the chiefs are playing, none of them had an offseason.

I dont buy the "he's not ready" spiel. The whole GD team is NOT READY...really we've been trounced TWICE..What do we have to lose in playing stanzi? Seriously, it really cant get worse....it cant. Put the kid in.

If he can produce anything at all with our schedule, and with our fail of an offense so far...think of what he will be able to do when our weapons get healthy again next year.

And if he bombs all over the field....We draft Luck. We have nothing to lose

[Iowanian]

I've caught myself asking that same question the past 2 weeks, but there is a simple answer.

Stanzi has some tools that could allow him to be a solid QB in the league. That said, playing him too early would probably ruin him, because I doubt he's ready. I'm a big hawk fan and before the draft compared Stanzi to Cassel.

He's got the size, he's got the arm, he's got the work ethic, he's got experience in the big games(which Cassel doesn't).....BUT for every game he looked great or every fantastic throw made under pressure, he'd make the most bone-headed Casselesque throw into triple coverage.

No offseason, no minicamps.....no work in the offseason in a professional capacity....no.

I'd rather he have more time to study and learn before being thrown to the wolves. maybe later in the season for experience.

[luv]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Palko has to fail before Stanzi gets a start. Forget about it. It's not happening.

I'm guessing I was mistaken whenever I thought that our depth chart was Cassel, Stanzi, and Palko?

[Bump]

Stanzi gives us a better chance at winning over Cassel and we are facing a time where winning can only hurt us. Unless Stanzi turns into an elite QB, which probably ain't happenin. We must get LUCKy!!!!