How much is each NFL team Worth?

[TinyEvel]

Chiefs rank #24 at 2.1 BILLION dollars. Hunts don't want to run them, I'm sure we could pool our bitcoin and buy them from the family. A bargain! WHo's with me?

link: https://www.forbes.com/nfl-valuations/list/#tab:overall

(sorry if this makes your eyes bleed. I couldn't get to space out)


Team Current Value 1-Yr ChangeDebt/ValueRevenue Oper Income
#1 Dallas Cowboys $4.8 B 14% 8% $840 M $350 M
#2 New England Patriots $3.7 B 9% 6% $575 M $247 M
#3 New York Giants $3.3 B 6% 15% $477 M $131 M
#4 Washington Redskins $3.1 B 5% 8% $482 M $145 M
#5 San Francisco 49ers $3.05 B 2% 16% $458 M $130 M
#6 Los Angeles Rams $3 B 3% 33% $370 M $82 M
#7 Chicago Bears $2.85 B 6% 4% $416 M $114 M
#8 Houston Texans $2.8 B 8% 2% $433 M $141 M
#9 New York Jets $2.75 B 0% 20% $431 M $92 M
#10 Philadelphia Eagles $2.65 B 6% 7% $430 M $63 M

#11 Denver Broncos $2.6 B 8% 4% $411 M $81 M
#12 Miami Dolphins $2.575 B 8% 17% $376 M $65 M
#13 Green Bay Packers $2.55 B 9% 4% $421 M $91 M
#14 Baltimore Ravens $2.5 B 9% 11% $403 M $78 M
#15 Atlanta Falcons $2.475 B 16% 34% $367 M $94 M
#16 Pittsburgh Steelers $2.45 B 9% 8% $401 M $102 M
#17 Seattle Seahawks $2.425 B 9% 6% $399 M $85 M
#18 Minnesota Vikings $2.4 B 9% 24% $392 M $105 M
#19 Oakland Raiders $2.38 B 13% 13% $321 M $41 M
#20 Indianapolis Colts $2.375 B 9% 3% $360 M $78 M
#21 Carolina Panthers $2.3 B 11% 3% $385 M $102 M
#22 Los Angeles Chargers $2.275 B 9% 7% $355 M $60 M
#23 Arizona Cardinals $2.15 B 6% 7% $370 M $87 M
#24 Kansas City Chiefs $2.1 B 12% 3% $365 M $60 M
#25 Jacksonville Jaguars $2.075 B 6% 4% $377 M $89 M
#26 Tennessee Titans $2.05 B 2% 7% $366 M $79 M
#27 New Orleans Saints $2 B 14% 10% $395 M $97 M
#28 Tampa Bay Buccaneers$1.975 B 10% 9% $367 M $80 M
#29 Cleveland Browns $1.95 B 5% 11% $365 M $97 M
#30 Cincinnati Bengals $1.8 B 7% 6% $355 M $77 M
#31 Detroit Lions $1.7 B 3% 15% $341 M $48 M
#32 Buffalo Bills $1.6 B 7% 12% $352 M $53 M

[kccrow]

One of the lowest revenue streams and one of the lowest operating revenues... hrmmm I'd have to think the Panthers are a bit better purchase at the moment, and they're actually for sale.

[ThaVirus]

Not surprising to see the entirety of the NFC East in the top 10

[displacedinMN]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Not surprising to see the entirety of the NFC East in the top 10

Agree. How many KC markets does it take to equal the NY market?

[Best22]

Originally Posted by bigjosh

Yeah, the whole list is market driven. It makes sense. Also worth note is that the entire NFC east is in the top 10, with three out of the top four spots. I wonder if that could have something to do with extra TV revenue from being forced down the audiences ****ing throat for 20 years.

The fact that the Ravens are worth more than the colts (who left baltimore) is funny to me. **** the colts.

Originally Posted by displacedinMN

Agree. How many KC markets does it take to equal the NY market?

About 10

['Hamas' Jenkins]

As soon as the live sports bubble bursts, these values are going to crater. If it was purely a money-making asset and not a dick-measuring contest, I'm sure a lot of these guys would be selling, too.

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

As soon as the live sports bubble bursts, these values are going to crater. If it was purely a money-making asset and not a dick-measuring contest, I'm sure a lot of these guys would be selling, too.

Won’t happen and if it does won’t be anytime soon.

[bigjosh]

I hate the format that came out up in the OP.

Here.

[TinyEvel]

Interesting how 6 of the top 10 are not really "legacy" or winning teams in the past 20 years.

But all are major markets.

[bigjosh]

Originally Posted by TinyEvel

Interesting how 6 of the top 10 are not really "legacy" or winning teams in the past 20 years.

But all are major markets.

Yeah, the whole list is market driven. It makes sense. Also worth note is that the entire NFC east is in the top 10, with three out of the top four spots. I wonder if that could have something to do with extra TV revenue from being forced down the audiences ****ing throat for 20 years.

The fact that the Ravens are worth more than the colts (who left baltimore) is funny to me. **** the colts.

[eDave]

Clark should sell.

[cooper barrett]

Originally Posted by eDave

Clark should sell.

He's loyal to KC at least until contact negotiations, then he's all: "We're out of here" bullshit.

Question is, who would buy a team for 2.1B with a nut of $305M and returns of $60M knowing that values, revenues and profits are going down.

If someone were to throw a $2B bone to the the Hunts would they take it? Capital gains did not change but reinvesting the money could avoid that.

[eDave]

Originally Posted by cooper barrett

He's loyal to KC at least until contact negotiations, then he's all: "We're out of here" bullshit.

Question is, who would buy a team for 2.1B with a nut of $305M and returns of $60M knowing that values, revenues and profits are going down.

If someone were to throw a $2B bone to the the Hunts would they take it? Capital gains did not change but reinvesting the money could avoid that.

P. Diddy

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by cooper barrett

He's loyal to KC at least until contact negotiations, then he's all: "We're out of here" bullshit.

Question is, who would buy a team for 2.1B with a nut of $305M and returns of $60M knowing that values, revenues and profits are going down.

If someone were to throw a $2B bone to the the Hunts would they take it? Capital gains did not change but reinvesting the money could avoid that.

Because an owner can do Jack shit and make a killing off of guaranteed, shared TV revenue. Revenue sharing may create parity, but it also creates no accountability. Owner can fail miserably but profit handsomely off of the leagues overall success. The more interesting bubble to watch is 2022 when the TV contract expires. I doubt the current TV players will pony up that kind of guaranteed cash. It's one of the things I hate about revenue sharing. If you can't make money, get out and sell it to someone who can. Wonder how many of these owners would do if they didn't have the cushion of other teams' shared TV revenue.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I doubt the current TV players will pony up that kind of guaranteed cash.

As usual, you're dead wrong.

There is no single episode of any broadcast TV series that can generate 26 million viewers, as the NFL can for ONE GAME, each week.

Nielsen ratings may be on the decline but that doesn't mean that the NFL's overall reach, including streaming and mobile services, is declining.