another trade....

chiefsfan58 · 08-14-2001, 09:32 PM

I need help again! Same league as before.... Td = 6 pts 20yds = point. Not a keeper league.... This is my basic roster....

QB- Warner and Jeff George

WR-Owens, Moss, Rice, and Troy Brown

RB- Eddie Geroge, Jamal Anderson, Micheal Bennett

TE- Mili (for joe seahawk!)

K - Vandrejact

D - Miami

This is the offer....

I get

Culpepper, Tim Brown, and Lamar Smith

I give -

Warner, Moss, and Micheal Bennett

Thanks for the advice!

Brock · 08-14-2001, 09:42 PM

I don't think I would trade Randy Moss. It looks to me like you have a quite formidable team as is.

Frazod · 08-14-2001, 09:45 PM

I'd personally stay away from Culpepper. The Vikes' O-line wasn't in great shape prior to Stringer's death, and now they're really in trouble. I think Culpepper's numbers will be down as he spends much more time running for his life this year.

Besides - how could you even think about parting with Warner?

chiefsfan58 · 08-14-2001, 09:45 PM

I'm concerened about my RBs, and am thiking Culpepper is and upgrade at QB. And this league is VERY competitive so I want to make sure i take advantage of every offer. And anytime Moss has an aweomse game, i'll get points through Culpepper anyways.

08-14-2001, 09:45 PM

NO WAY! Keep your team and pocket your money at the end of the season champ.

chiefsfan58 · 08-14-2001, 09:47 PM

wow, i though everyone would want me to jump all over it, I thought Culpepper would do much better than Warner since he runs in thr TDs, plus Faulk steals A LOT of TDs from Warner.

Brock · 08-14-2001, 09:49 PM

I think Warner vs. Culpepper is close to a wash. Lamar Smith and Tim Brown are significantly older than your players and are more likely to miss time. I'd stick with what you have, though Bennett is a question mark.

Alphaman · 08-14-2001, 09:52 PM

20 yards = point...

Is that passing yards as well. Warner will have over 300 passing yards a game, and several games over 400.

Moss will outshine Tim Brown most every game.

You've got George, so Bennet is worth the risk.

Stay away from this deal.

keg in kc · 08-14-2001, 09:53 PM

I concur with the majority. Keep what'cha got in this instance.

chiefsfan58 · 08-14-2001, 10:04 PM

All right, thanks guys, I just wasn't sure that pretty boy warner would put up the same stats as 99, but I think I'll stick with this for now. Thanks!

**The Bad Guy** · 08-14-2001, 11:19 PM

Do not trade away Kurt Warner and Moss.

Keep what you have, you have a very very good team.

I concur with Frazod though, Culpepper will have a career year again this season.

He looked incredible against the Saints, and will be asked to do more in the offense without a running game. That translates into big fantasy points. Plus, no QB will touch him in rushing yards.

I have him in my league along with Curtis Martin, Mike Anderson, Isaac Bruce, Antonio Freeman and Tony Gonzalez.

Abba-Dabba · 08-15-2001, 02:39 AM

Do not trade Warner or Moss. Micheal Bennett looks good I just wonder how he will fare when Minnesota trys to throw him the ball.

L.Smith I am beginning to believe with have another strong year, Culpepper the same. Tim Brown is a tricky tricky player this year, How many passes does Rice, Garner and Porter take away from Brown. Some say not many but I believe they are wrong and Brown may just end up with 50-60 receptions this year with only 800yds 6-7TD's as opposed to Moss who may get even more balls this year with the loss of Robert Smith and Mathew Hatchette and he is ultimately the most explosive WR in football history, I have heard counters of this as to "well they signed J.Reed" my answer to that is always, when was the last year that J.Reed caught over 40 receptions and didn't take any time off during the season because of injuries?

htismaqe · 08-15-2001, 08:42 AM

NOT SO FAST!

There's no reason to believe that Lamar Smith will fall off in production, the way that team is structured...

This would be a good trade, at least in our league, because running backs that average over 12 FPPG (Lamar averaged 12.3) are far more rare...

Warner vs. Culpepper was dead even last year in FPPG, plus Warner missed 5...

Lamar Smith, IMO will average more than 4 FFPG better than Bennett.

Moss, IMO, will average less than 4 FFPG better than Brown. Plus, in our league, points for WR are lower.

Running back is the most important position in our league. Getting Lamar Smith could be a good move...

08-14-2001, 09:32 PM
chiefsfan58 ultimate chiefs fan Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: san francisco Casino cash: $-933579	another trade.... I need help again! Same league as before.... Td = 6 pts 20yds = point. Not a keeper league.... This is my basic roster.... QB- Warner and Jeff George WR-Owens, Moss, Rice, and Troy Brown RB- Eddie Geroge, Jamal Anderson, Micheal Bennett TE- Mili (for joe seahawk!) K - Vandrejact D - Miami This is the offer.... I get Culpepper, Tim Brown, and Lamar Smith I give - Warner, Moss, and Micheal Bennett Thanks for the advice!
Posts: 749

08-14-2001, 09:42 PM	#2
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	I don't think I would trade Randy Moss. It looks to me like you have a quite formidable team as is.
Posts: 47,314

08-14-2001, 09:45 PM	#3
Frazod Did you hear what I said? Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $-666615	I'd personally stay away from Culpepper. The Vikes' O-line wasn't in great shape prior to Stringer's death, and now they're really in trouble. I think Culpepper's numbers will be down as he spends much more time running for his life this year. Besides - how could you even think about parting with Warner?
Posts: 121,727

08-14-2001, 09:45 PM	#4
chiefsfan58 ultimate chiefs fan Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: san francisco Casino cash: $-933579	I'm concerened about my RBs, and am thiking Culpepper is and upgrade at QB. And this league is VERY competitive so I want to make sure i take advantage of every offer. And anytime Moss has an aweomse game, i'll get points through Culpepper anyways. __________________ Arash ...!
Posts: 749

08-14-2001, 09:45 PM	#5
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	NO WAY! Keep your team and pocket your money at the end of the season champ.
Posts: n/a

08-14-2001, 09:47 PM	#6
chiefsfan58 ultimate chiefs fan Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: san francisco Casino cash: $-933579	wow, i though everyone would want me to jump all over it, I thought Culpepper would do much better than Warner since he runs in thr TDs, plus Faulk steals A LOT of TDs from Warner. __________________ Arash ...! Last edited by chiefsfan58; 08-14-2001 at 09:50 PM..
Posts: 749

08-14-2001, 09:49 PM	#7
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	I think Warner vs. Culpepper is close to a wash. Lamar Smith and Tim Brown are significantly older than your players and are more likely to miss time. I'd stick with what you have, though Bennett is a question mark.
Posts: 47,314

08-14-2001, 09:52 PM	#8
Alphaman Veteran Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Austin, TX, USA Casino cash: $10004900	20 yards = point... Is that passing yards as well. Warner will have over 300 passing yards a game, and several games over 400. Moss will outshine Tim Brown most every game. You've got George, so Bennet is worth the risk. Stay away from this deal.
Posts: 1,380

08-14-2001, 09:53 PM	#9
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	I concur with the majority. Keep what'cha got in this instance.
Posts: 58,682

08-14-2001, 10:04 PM	#10
chiefsfan58 ultimate chiefs fan Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: san francisco Casino cash: $-933579	All right, thanks guys, I just wasn't sure that pretty boy warner would put up the same stats as 99, but I think I'll stick with this for now. Thanks! __________________ Arash ...!
Posts: 749

08-14-2001, 11:19 PM	#11
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	Do not trade away Kurt Warner and Moss. Keep what you have, you have a very very good team. I concur with Frazod though, Culpepper will have a career year again this season. He looked incredible against the Saints, and will be asked to do more in the offense without a running game. That translates into big fantasy points. Plus, no QB will touch him in rushing yards. I have him in my league along with Curtis Martin, Mike Anderson, Isaac Bruce, Antonio Freeman and Tony Gonzalez. __________________
Posts: 23,216

08-15-2001, 02:39 AM	#12
Abba-Dabba MVP Join Date: May 2001 Casino cash: $3582970	chiefsfan58 Do not trade Warner or Moss. Micheal Bennett looks good I just wonder how he will fare when Minnesota trys to throw him the ball. L.Smith I am beginning to believe with have another strong year, Culpepper the same. Tim Brown is a tricky tricky player this year, How many passes does Rice, Garner and Porter take away from Brown. Some say not many but I believe they are wrong and Brown may just end up with 50-60 receptions this year with only 800yds 6-7TD's as opposed to Moss who may get even more balls this year with the loss of Robert Smith and Mathew Hatchette and he is ultimately the most explosive WR in football history, I have heard counters of this as to "well they signed J.Reed" my answer to that is always, when was the last year that J.Reed caught over 40 receptions and didn't take any time off during the season because of injuries?
Posts: 18,278

08-15-2001, 08:42 AM	#13
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8179900	NOT SO FAST! There's no reason to believe that Lamar Smith will fall off in production, the way that team is structured... This would be a good trade, at least in our league, because running backs that average over 12 FPPG (Lamar averaged 12.3) are far more rare... Warner vs. Culpepper was dead even last year in FPPG, plus Warner missed 5... Lamar Smith, IMO will average more than 4 FFPG better than Bennett. Moss, IMO, will average less than 4 FFPG better than Brown. Plus, in our league, points for WR are lower. Running back is the most important position in our league. Getting Lamar Smith could be a good move...
Posts: 104,293