KU Reesing > Daniels

ferrarispider95 · 11-29-2008, 03:59 PM

Done more with less talent.

Always just a sidestep away from a big play.

KC_Connection · 11-29-2008, 04:00 PM

No doubt. Reesing is a clutch performer. He steps up in big games when it really counts.

Daniel has never been able to this. A true choker.

teedubya · 11-29-2008, 04:01 PM

It's "Danielson" Dumbass.

Dayze · 11-29-2008, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

No doubt. Reesing is a clutch performer. He steps up in big games when it really counts.

Daniel has never been able to this. A true choker.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but this outta be good to watch/read.

Silock · 11-29-2008, 04:02 PM

I don't dislike Daniel at all, but I think it's true that Reesing has done more with less than Daniel has. But Daniel has been very, very good at times this season. I don't think Reesing would have done as well without Meier, though. They both have their go-to guys.

Pablo · 11-29-2008, 04:03 PM

It's McDaniels.

KC_Connection · 11-29-2008, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dayzeofthenew

I don't have a dog in this fight, but this outta be good to watch/read.

I tell it like I see it.

Mr. Laz · 11-29-2008, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88

It's McDaniels.

McDonalds?

teedubya · 11-29-2008, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88

It's McDaniels.

Wait, we are both wrong. It's Chase McDanielson. We were close though.

Dayze · 11-29-2008, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I tell it like I see it.

I got ya; I haven't watched enough of either team to even form on opinion on these guys.

Just sayin'; the arguments for each will be interesting to read.

Pablo · 11-29-2008, 04:10 PM

I think if you swapped either guy onto the other squad, they'd probably do just about the exact same thing.

Reesing in a MU uni, or Daniel in a KU uni...they're both still spread offense hobbits that can use their legs and make great plays while avoiding the rush. I will say I think Reesing is a bit tougher mentally, and doesn't let bad plays affect his as much during the course of the game, but Daniel is probably the better physical talent. Reesing is also better at avoiding the rush and moving in the pocket, while Daniel is better at gashing throught the D line and LB's for big runs.

But if they swapped teams 3 years ago, I'm pretty confident it would be a similar scenario.

KC_Connection · 11-29-2008, 04:11 PM

Quote:

I will say I think Reesing is a bit tougher mentally, and doesn't let bad plays affect his as much during the course of the game

That's the key in sports.

ferrarispider95 · 11-29-2008, 04:11 PM

Maclin is a stud, wouldn't mind having him on the Chiefs, but he is a mid, late 1st rounder and we need too many other needs.

Coffman should be a 1st rounder too.

Apparently the 3rd Coffman brother at Ray-pec is better than both brothers coming of highschool.

DJJasonp · 11-29-2008, 04:23 PM

I'm a big time KU fan....but I think it's awfully hard to put Daniel below Reesing.

Especially at this point....if Reesing has another great year next year...KU wins 10 games, goes to a good bowl....then you might be able to say Reesing is better than Daniel.

This is coming from a huge Reesing fan.

To be honest though....I'm not so sure Reesing has "less to work with"....Briscoe, Meier, Fields (who was it last year...Henry???)...McAnderson...Sharp.....and last year the TE Derek Fine (currently in the NFL).

Reesing has had a tougher go this year because of the o-line.

teedubya · 11-29-2008, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJJasonp

I'm a big time KU fan....but I think it's awfully hard to put Daniel below Reesing.

Especially at this point....if Reesing has another great year next year...KU wins 10 games, goes to a good bowl....then you might be able to say Reesing is better than Daniel.

This is coming from a huge Reesing fan.

To be honest though....I'm not so sure Reesing has "less to work with"....Briscoe, Meier, Fields (who was it last year...Henry???)...McAnderson...Sharp.....and last year the TE Derek Fine (currently in the NFL).

Reesing has had a tougher go this year because of the o-line.

If the Left Tackle Anthony Collins had stayed... we may have won an extra 2 games.

11-29-2008, 03:59 PM
ferrarispider95 She reads at a sophomore level Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: KANSAS Casino cash: $10004945	Reesing > Daniels Done more with less talent. Always just a sidestep away from a big play.
Posts: 1,493

11-29-2008, 04:00 PM	#2
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $1712783	No doubt. Reesing is a clutch performer. He steps up in big games when it really counts. Daniel has never been able to this. A true choker.
Posts: 57,697

11-29-2008, 04:01 PM	#3
teedubya Most Valuable Poster Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $8993042	It's "Danielson" Dumbass.
Posts: 36,828

11-29-2008, 04:02 PM	#5
Silock MVP Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Overland Park Casino cash: $10020882	I don't dislike Daniel at all, but I think it's true that Reesing has done more with less than Daniel has. But Daniel has been very, very good at times this season. I don't think Reesing would have done as well without Meier, though. They both have their go-to guys.
Posts: 19,908

11-29-2008, 04:03 PM	#6
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northland Casino cash: $-1700644	It's McDaniels.
Posts: 43,810

11-29-2008, 04:10 PM	#11
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northland Casino cash: $-1700644	I think if you swapped either guy onto the other squad, they'd probably do just about the exact same thing. Reesing in a MU uni, or Daniel in a KU uni...they're both still spread offense hobbits that can use their legs and make great plays while avoiding the rush. I will say I think Reesing is a bit tougher mentally, and doesn't let bad plays affect his as much during the course of the game, but Daniel is probably the better physical talent. Reesing is also better at avoiding the rush and moving in the pocket, while Daniel is better at gashing throught the D line and LB's for big runs. But if they swapped teams 3 years ago, I'm pretty confident it would be a similar scenario.
Posts: 43,810

11-29-2008, 04:11 PM	#13
ferrarispider95 She reads at a sophomore level Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: KANSAS Casino cash: $10004945	Maclin is a stud, wouldn't mind having him on the Chiefs, but he is a mid, late 1st rounder and we need too many other needs. Coffman should be a 1st rounder too. Apparently the 3rd Coffman brother at Ray-pec is better than both brothers coming of highschool. __________________ www.steerplanet.com Show Steers Directory and Forum www.emporiaks.org Free Emporia, KS Apartment Rental Listings
Posts: 1,493

11-29-2008, 04:23 PM	#14
DJJasonp My work speaks for itself!!! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: So Cal Casino cash: $-1704800	I'm a big time KU fan....but I think it's awfully hard to put Daniel below Reesing. Especially at this point....if Reesing has another great year next year...KU wins 10 games, goes to a good bowl....then you might be able to say Reesing is better than Daniel. This is coming from a huge Reesing fan. To be honest though....I'm not so sure Reesing has "less to work with"....Briscoe, Meier, Fields (who was it last year...Henry???)...McAnderson...Sharp.....and last year the TE Derek Fine (currently in the NFL). Reesing has had a tougher go this year because of the o-line. __________________ Its easier to fool a man, than to convince a man he's been fooled.
Posts: 13,897