My official endorsement for the 11th overall pick. - Page 4

Direckshun · 03-01-2012, 12:44 AM

It's not year to envy the decisions this front office has to make at the precarious position of #11 overall. There doesn't seem to be a quarterback on the board that is truly worth that investment, nor is there a nose tackle. And there is some debate as to whether running backs, right tackles, or guards should ever warrant that degree of investment.

As a result, if these are the options the Chiefs have to work with, the absolutely ideal option is to trade down from the 11th overall pick. If there is some way the Chiefs can trade down at all, they make the investment required of them less significant, while acquiring more talent in later rounds as a result.

I am normally not a big fan of trading down (I like taking the very best talent available), when your best options are running backs and right tackles, even a modest move down to something like the 16th pick makes our options much more appealing.

But assuming the Chiefs cannot trade down, and must select at this position, I believe the Kansas City Chiefs should draft RB Trent Richardson of Alabama with the 11th overall pick. The question of adding talent to your team via the draft should be focused around one question: how much better is your team with them than they were before?

With all the names floating around, like Tannehill, Poe, DeCastro, or Reiff, there is no player that dramatically changes what this team can do quite like Trent Richardson.

Let's break this down. Like I said a moment ago, the 11th pick is a very hard one to project for the Chiefs this year, because while the Chiefs have the 11th pick, there are really only six sure things to be off the board before their selection:

QB Andrew Luck, Stanford
QB Robert Griffin III, Baylor
WR Justin Blackmon, Oklahoma State
OT Matt Kalil, USC
CB Morris Claiborne, LSU
DE Melvin Ingram, South Carolina

After that, we simply don't know how the other picks will fall.

Here is a list of the people that could ostensibly be available by the time the Chiefs are on the clock at #11:

QB Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M
RB Trent Richardson, Alabama
OT Riley Reiff, Iowa
OT Jonathan Martin, Stanford
OT Mike Adams, Ohio State
OT/OG Cordy Glenn, Georgia
OG David DeCastro, Stanford
NT Dontari Poe, Memphis
DE Quentin Coples, North Carolina
ILB Luke Kuechly, Boston College
OLB Courtney Upshaw, Alabama
OLB Nick Perry, USC
CB Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama

There are some potential All Pros on this position, some players that would really help the Chiefs, and some players that don't fit at all.

To get to the players I'd prefer the Chiefs select, let's exercise the process of elimination.

Players That Don't Fit

OT Mike Adams, Ohio State

I always had a sneaking suspicion all year that Adams could turn out to be a great right tackle in the NFL. He's got the size, the domination in the run game, the occasionally plodding feet. He has a whiff of left tackle potential, which I thought would be useful in case we needed someone to fill in for a holding-out Branden Albert in 2013.

The problem with Adams is that there has been a heavy cloud of hearsay arising from the fact that he has serious character issues. He served not one, but two suspensions during his time at Ohio State, and now we've seen a serious lack of discipline during this draft season, which is just Vontaze Burfict levels of clinical stupidity. He only put up 19 reps at the Combine, which is evidence that he's not putting in the effort, at only the most important time in his career to do so.

DE Quentin Coples, North Carolina

Coples is a large, powerful passrusher who is not a fit in the 3-4. He is a 4-3 end only. Not to mention the fact that he's overrated.

CB Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama

Kirkpatrick is incredibly talented, and despite some of his character concerns, would have been a perfectly fine fit for Crennel's defense. But the signing of Routt, a similar type of corner, make going for a corner in the first round impractical.

Players That Fit, But Aren't Worth The #11 Overall

QB Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M

This will no doubt be the hardest sell to many of my fellow QB enthusiasts, who will be feeling particularly dejected once the Chiefs inevitably lose out on Peyton Manning in free agency and make miniscule QB depth chart moves in free agency like acquiring Chad Henne.

And I understand the exasperation. I've long believed you build your team around the QB position, and that QBs therefore require first round picks in any administration's attempt to build a Super Bowl winner. I advocated Matt Ryan in 2008, Mark Sanchez in 2009, and Jimmy Clausen in 2010. But I didn't advocate a QB with our first round pick in 2011 for the same reason I won't be advocating one this year: the value doesn't match the player.

Tannehill is a gifted athlete, and he does have some tools to piece together a franchise QB if he undergoes dramatic enough reconstruction. But his brief collegiate career (only 20 starts) and his inability to play up to the levels of his elite opponents is damning. All things being equal, Tannehill is a second round quality quarterback who is going to "Christian Ponder" up the big board due to some team's desperation at the QB position.

With a great QB class looming in 2013, there is no reason for us to be that team.

OT Jonathan Martin, Stanford

Martin is a talented finesse tackle, but simply doesn't bring the thunder or play with the aggressiveness you want to see from your franchise right tackle. Martin is much more natural playing on the left side, and should the Chiefs at this juncture decide that they aren't going to want to pay Branden Albert "franchise LT" money, bringing in Martin to eventually replace him is logical.

I think Martin can thrive on the left side. He is out of place on the right. As I am of the opinion that the Chiefs should pay Albert rather than let him walk, I do not advocate taking Martin.

NT Dontari Poe, Memphis

After watching Poe on tape and catching his Combine performance, I think that he could have a dynamic NFL career if he lands in the right system with the right coach. And he will need both in order to be successful. It's pretty clear he lacks discipline, and has been getting by at this point on his size and amazing measurables.

I don't think he's a two-gapper. He showed absolutely zero flashes to drop anchor in his time in Memphis. His technique is somewhere in the vicinity of nonexistant, and while that not mean much in a one-gap 3-4 defense where the objective is to penetrate and beat offensive lineman, a ton of technique is required to absorb blockers and eat up space like two-gap 3-4 defenses demand.

ILB Luke Kuechly, Boston College

I actually think Kuechly might be worth the #11 overall. I think he has the potential to be an impact interior linebacker in this league.

The problem is that he's not a natural thumper. He's much more of an athletic, all-purpose linebacker in the vein of Derrick Johnson. And, well, we already have a Derrick Johnson. You need the other ILB spot in Crennel's 3-4 defense to be a line of scrimmage destroyer like Jovan Belcher.

OLB/ILB Courtney Upshaw, Alabama

Speaking of a thumper: Courtney Upshaw. Upshaw is a large-sized OLB with experience in Alabama's 3-4, where he was utilized all over the field as a down-lineman, an outside rusher, and an interior line-pounder. Upshaw's versatility could be a big boost for Kansas City's defense, particularly if you believe Jovan Belcher is a weak link. A starting lineup of Hali-Upshaw-Johnson-Houston could be one of the best in the league.

The problem is that Upshaw doesn't look like a linebacker. He's not terribly slow, but his footwork and his athleticism look like that of an athletic down-lineman in a 4-3, and aren't on par with what you want from a linebacker. He just doesn't look the part unless he finds a way to drop 15-20 lbs and retain his power.

Players Worth Selecting

RB Trent Richardson, Alabama

WHY SELECT HIM: Richardson is a game-changing RB prospect on par with Adrian Peterson. He can be used in all three downs, and does it all: he can pound the line of scrimmage, he can get the tough yardage, he can glide in space and eat up yardage, he can pick up the blitz, he can receive out of the backfield. And combined with the similar all-around package of Jamaal Charles, who is smaller but also capable of running between the tackles, the Chiefs would have the best run game in the NFL by far. The pick would transform Matt Cassel into his Pro Bowl self from 2010, as Cassel only plays up to his maximum ability when the Chiefs can run the ball. Pairing Richardson with Charles ensures that transformation.

WHY NOT TO: Running back is a brutal position with a short shelf-life. I personally believe that Richardson could buck this trend as he is a legendary worker in the weight room. You could get a Maurice Jones-Drew career out of him very easily, I believe.

OT Riley Reiff, Iowa

WHY SELECT HIM: Reiff offers the most tackle flexibility of any of the Tier A tackles; Kalil and Martin can't play the right side, and Adams can't play the left. Reiff has the athleticism and technique to play the left side adequately, but he has the strength, power, and attitude to be a picture-perfect right tackle in the zone blocking system. This pick is the best of all worlds to solve the Chiefs' desperate tackle situation -- it gives them a ten-year, rock-solid starter at the right tackle position, while picking up insurance in case Branden Albert holds out in 2013. Reiff is not ideal for the left side, but he can play anywhere on the line, and is one of the surest picks in the draft this side of Andrew Luck.

WHY NOT TO: Unlike a couple of the other options at this point, Richardson and DeCastro, Reiff is not an all-time prospect at his position. He's just a very good prospect. So this, of course, begs the question: do you take a very good player at a more important position (OT), or do you take a phenomenal player at a less important position (OG, RB)?

OT/OG Cordy Glenn, Georgia

WHY SELECT HIM: If Reiff is the guy with the highest floor, Glenn is the guy with the highest ceiling. Glenn is someone you select if you believe Branden Albert is your franchise right tackle, and now you're just looking for someone to be able to similarly dominate at right tackle. Glenn's potential is limitless -- he's got some of the longest arms of the draft class, still benched as much as anybody despite those arms, and runs a 5.0 40 yard dash. His footwork in pass protection can be improved, and his run-blocking has the potential to be peerless at right tackle.

WHY NOT TO: There is a bust factor that's much higher than everybody else on this list. Glenn was never an outstanding pass protector at Georgia, though he was always a devastating run blocker. You typically don't like to have to spend tons of time reconstructing the habits of your #11 overall draft pick.

OG David DeCastro, Stanford

WHY SELECT HIM: Grouped with Albert, Hudson, and Asamoah, you would have an offensive line grouping (along with a RT of your choosing) that could last for close to a decade. But unlike those three players, DeCastro is not merely another piece to the puzzle; he could be the cornerstone of your line. A methodical, brutal blocker, DeCastro can neutralize nose tackles and chase down linebackers at the second level. He was Stanford's franchise player in the run-game, and he almost single-handedly plowed the Trees' run game. The Chiefs need the run game to be successful for Cassel to play well, and DeCastro offers you an elite, All Pro talent at the position that can keep Matt Cassel clean from Day One.

WHY NOT TO: You can find an extremely talented guards all over the NFL Draft, and free agency is loaded with them. You should not have to spend the #11 pick on a guard. DeCastro is a "franchise" guard, but what is that really worth when merely "really good" guards can also get the job done?

OLB Nick Perry, USC

WHY SELECT HIM: Because the Giants proved a passrush is truly the 1B need of a championship football team (quarterback being 1A, of course). Right now the Chiefs have a good team in Tamba Hali and Justin Houston, but (a.) Houston is not a sure thing, and has only really had one very good month as a rookie, and (b.) if either of these players go down with injury, the Chiefs find themselves mired in the same problem they've had for ages. Perry is a super-athlete, and has more drop-back ability than Houston. He is raw, but his elite athleticism make him the perfect versatile weapon for Crennel to tool with in any package he can possibly dream up.

WHY NOT TO: The Chiefs do, nonetheless, sport two very solid passrushers, while sporting desperate holes at a few other positions that the players above would address. Perry is a smart pick if you're not confident in Houston's development, but I am personally quite confident in Justin Houston.

But Richardson at 11 isn't ideal, right?

Right. As plenty of the names above indicate, the Chiefs can trade down as many as ten spots and still be in golden position to land much of the above talent. Trading down is the best possible solution.

If trading down is not possible, and Richardson is available, you take him and you sleep like a baby. After him, I'd probably take Reiff, and then DeCastro. But I'd be completely happy with either Glenn or Perry.

O.city · 03-04-2012, 08:23 PM

Up or down?

Only reason I would take Richardson is based on Charles injury and injury history. Richardson is a monster who could handle a ton of carries if you need him to. I'm not sure that he woudln't end up being better than Charles.

Saccopoo · 03-04-2012, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Up or down?

Up.

I think that they go for Griffin.

Quote:

Only reason I would take Richardson is based on Charles injury and injury history. Richardson is a monster who could handle a ton of carries if you need him to. I'm not sure that he woudln't end up being better than Charles

It's going to be hard being better than Charles. Like I said, on any given Sunday, Charles is the best back in the league. And Richardson is coming off a knee scope of his own. No running back is completely immune to the injury bug, and because of what they do, they are susceptible to injury moreso than a lot of other positions.

If Charles' knee is okay, the Richardson pick is a bad one. If Charles is not sound medically, it's still a risky pick just based on the position alone.

O.city · 03-04-2012, 09:05 PM

Better than Charles is kind of a bad use of words.

I think he could be more complete than Charles. I don't think there is a RB duty that he guy can't do at a top level.

If I'm not mistaken, he just had his knee scoped. A knee he hurt earlier in the season but played with it for a little while.

I get the rb stuff, but IMO he's one of the top 4 or 5 talents in the draft. It would be hard to pass that up.

Saccopoo · 03-04-2012, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Better than Charles is kind of a bad use of words.

I think he could be more complete than Charles. I don't think there is a RB duty that he guy can't do at a top level.

If I'm not mistaken, he just had his knee scoped. A knee he hurt earlier in the season but played with it for a little while.

I get the rb stuff, but IMO he's one of the top 4 or 5 talents in the draft. It would be hard to pass that up.

I think he's an elite level talent for the position.

There are some very nice players in this draft. Luck, Griffin, Kalil, DeCastro, Kuechly and Richardson are all "elite" level players. Blackmon, Claiborne, Konz and Jenkins are "near elite." And there are some really good, solid players like Reiff, Kirkpatrick and Martin. There is also some real high-ceiling "boom-bust" guys like Brockers, Poe, etc. It's one of the better first rounds that I can remember.

The problem is, the Chiefs kind of fall into a no-man's land at that #11 pick with regards to need/BPA. Richardson is a luxury. Kuechly is a luxury. DeCastro is a luxury. Griffin/Luck is going to cost an arm and a leg to go get. Martin is a left tackle. (Do they go that route and move Albert over to RT?) Do you draft a right tackle, like Reiff, that high?

It's a very solid, top heavy draft with a deep first round and good talent deep at a lot of positions. The Chiefs should come out with a very good player regardless.

O.city · 03-04-2012, 09:24 PM

I could get on board with RGIII, if we use the rest of our late picks to do some damage.

Which is possible as this is a deep draft.

O.city · 03-04-2012, 11:22 PM

You really think they will move up for RGIII?

Saccopoo · 03-04-2012, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

You really think they will move up for RGIII?

I think that they are going to make an effort to do so.

Pioli takes McCluster with a very high second. He's a luxury pick in that we had Charles and Bowe. With the other second rounder he takes Arenas. Both are special team/third down specialists at that point.

The following year, he takes a safety in the top five. Something that's almost taboo in the draft.

These guys were speed guys, explosive guys. Also smart guys and team leaders.

Griffin is that same type of guy. At a substantially more important position.

He's moved up in the last couple of drafts for tight ends. It's not like he's against doing so.

I think Griffin is projecting as the type of guy Pioli wants, and I think that they get involved in the trade up process.

O.city · 03-04-2012, 11:38 PM

Would you do it Sac?

I think I would if we can keep our picks from the 3 on this year.

Saccopoo · 03-05-2012, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Would you do it Sac?

I think I would if we can keep our picks from the 3 on this year.

I don't know.

It's risky to give up what it's going to require to move up for an unknown commodity.

He doesn't have a big frame and I'd worry about potential injury due to his propensity to run on a play break down. He's not Tebow or Newton or Rothlisberger or even Luck.

He is electric though, and has already energized the fan base just thinking about him on the field in a Chief's uniform.

He comes across as intelligent, seems to have an understanding of the game and plays with passion. But so does a guy like Kellen Moore, who has four solid years of winning football behind him, and you could get Moore in the fifth/sixth round.

I just don't know. However, I think that they understand that the fan base needs something like this. Look what Tebow did in Denver. Newton in Carolina. I think Pioli/Crennel/Hunt want it and I think that they'll do their due diligence in exploring all the options.

Chiefs=Champions · 03-05-2012, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

I don't know.

It's risky to give up what it's going to require to move up for an unknown commodity.

He doesn't have a big frame and I'd worry about potential injury due to his propensity to run on a play break down. He's not Tebow or Newton or Rothlisberger or even Luck.

He is electric though, and has already energized the fan base just thinking about him on the field in a Chief's uniform.

He comes across as intelligent, seems to have an understanding of the game and plays with passion. But so does a guy like Kellen Moore, who has four solid years of winning football behind him, and you could get Moore in the fifth/sixth round.

I just don't know. However, I think that they understand that the fan base needs something like this. Look what Tebow did in Denver. Newton in Carolina. I think Pioli/Crennel/Hunt want it and I think that they'll do their due diligence in exploring all the options.

One of the better posts ive seen in a while, minus the moore talk.

Saccopoo · 03-05-2012, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good

One of the better posts ive seen in a while, minus the moore talk.

I was simply pointing out that it's the athleticism of Griffin that is putting him into the top ten as Moore has every intangible that you would want in a quarterback, minus that elite level athleticism that you get with Griffin.

But, as I mentioned, because he doesn't possess a big frame, and never will, that elite level of athleticism might come with the potential for injuries as the quarterback is susectible to those blind side, bad angle hit and tackles, especially when a play breaks down and he takes off running.

I see Griffin as a modern day equivilent of Fran Tarkenton. Tark was a very fast, athletic quarterback who also possessed a very good arm and superb field awareness but had a relatively small frame. He made a Hall of Fame career on his ability to successfully extend a play after it had broken down with both his arm and legs. If you've never seen Tarkenton play, it was absolutely electric - very similar to what you are going to get with Griffin. Frantic Fran was also very smart and had a great understanding of the game.

If Griffin possesses the uncanny ability to feel the defense and see the field like Tark did, he'll be just fine. If he relies simply on his arm and athleticism to play, much like Vick, he's going to open himself up to the potential for injuries.

Direckshun · 04-26-2012, 09:33 PM

From the OP.

Quote:

NT Dontari Poe, Memphis
After watching Poe on tape and catching his Combine performance, I think that he could have a dynamic NFL career if he lands in the right system with the right coach. And he will need both in order to be successful. It's pretty clear he lacks discipline, and has been getting by at this point on his size and amazing measurables.

I don't think he's a two-gapper. He showed absolutely zero flashes to drop anchor in his time in Memphis. His technique is somewhere in the vicinity of nonexistant, and while that not mean much in a one-gap 3-4 defense where the objective is to penetrate and beat offensive lineman, a ton of technique is required to absorb blockers and eat up space like two-gap 3-4 defenses demand.

This is what Crennel is up against.

03-01-2012, 12:44 AM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $2033447	My official endorsement for the 11th overall pick. It's not year to envy the decisions this front office has to make at the precarious position of #11 overall. There doesn't seem to be a quarterback on the board that is truly worth that investment, nor is there a nose tackle. And there is some debate as to whether running backs, right tackles, or guards should ever warrant that degree of investment. As a result, if these are the options the Chiefs have to work with, the absolutely ideal option is to trade down from the 11th overall pick. If there is some way the Chiefs can trade down at all, they make the investment required of them less significant, while acquiring more talent in later rounds as a result. I am normally not a big fan of trading down (I like taking the very best talent available), when your best options are running backs and right tackles, even a modest move down to something like the 16th pick makes our options much more appealing. But assuming the Chiefs cannot trade down, and must select at this position, I believe the Kansas City Chiefs should draft RB Trent Richardson of Alabama with the 11th overall pick. The question of adding talent to your team via the draft should be focused around one question: how much better is your team with them than they were before? With all the names floating around, like Tannehill, Poe, DeCastro, or Reiff, there is no player that dramatically changes what this team can do quite like Trent Richardson. Let's break this down. Like I said a moment ago, the 11th pick is a very hard one to project for the Chiefs this year, because while the Chiefs have the 11th pick, there are really only six sure things to be off the board before their selection: QB Andrew Luck, Stanford QB Robert Griffin III, Baylor WR Justin Blackmon, Oklahoma State OT Matt Kalil, USC CB Morris Claiborne, LSU DE Melvin Ingram, South Carolina After that, we simply don't know how the other picks will fall. Here is a list of the people that could ostensibly be available by the time the Chiefs are on the clock at #11: QB Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M RB Trent Richardson, Alabama OT Riley Reiff, Iowa OT Jonathan Martin, Stanford OT Mike Adams, Ohio State OT/OG Cordy Glenn, Georgia OG David DeCastro, Stanford NT Dontari Poe, Memphis DE Quentin Coples, North Carolina ILB Luke Kuechly, Boston College OLB Courtney Upshaw, Alabama OLB Nick Perry, USC CB Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama There are some potential All Pros on this position, some players that would really help the Chiefs, and some players that don't fit at all. To get to the players I'd prefer the Chiefs select, let's exercise the process of elimination. Players That Don't Fit OT Mike Adams, Ohio State I always had a sneaking suspicion all year that Adams could turn out to be a great right tackle in the NFL. He's got the size, the domination in the run game, the occasionally plodding feet. He has a whiff of left tackle potential, which I thought would be useful in case we needed someone to fill in for a holding-out Branden Albert in 2013. The problem with Adams is that there has been a heavy cloud of hearsay arising from the fact that he has serious character issues. He served not one, but two suspensions during his time at Ohio State, and now we've seen a serious lack of discipline during this draft season, which is just Vontaze Burfict levels of clinical stupidity. He only put up 19 reps at the Combine, which is evidence that he's not putting in the effort, at only the most important time in his career to do so. DE Quentin Coples, North Carolina Coples is a large, powerful passrusher who is not a fit in the 3-4. He is a 4-3 end only. Not to mention the fact that he's overrated. CB Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama Kirkpatrick is incredibly talented, and despite some of his character concerns, would have been a perfectly fine fit for Crennel's defense. But the signing of Routt, a similar type of corner, make going for a corner in the first round impractical. Players That Fit, But Aren't Worth The #11 Overall QB Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M This will no doubt be the hardest sell to many of my fellow QB enthusiasts, who will be feeling particularly dejected once the Chiefs inevitably lose out on Peyton Manning in free agency and make miniscule QB depth chart moves in free agency like acquiring Chad Henne. And I understand the exasperation. I've long believed you build your team around the QB position, and that QBs therefore require first round picks in any administration's attempt to build a Super Bowl winner. I advocated Matt Ryan in 2008, Mark Sanchez in 2009, and Jimmy Clausen in 2010. But I didn't advocate a QB with our first round pick in 2011 for the same reason I won't be advocating one this year: the value doesn't match the player. Tannehill is a gifted athlete, and he does have some tools to piece together a franchise QB if he undergoes dramatic enough reconstruction. But his brief collegiate career (only 20 starts) and his inability to play up to the levels of his elite opponents is damning. All things being equal, Tannehill is a second round quality quarterback who is going to "Christian Ponder" up the big board due to some team's desperation at the QB position. With a great QB class looming in 2013, there is no reason for us to be that team. OT Jonathan Martin, Stanford Martin is a talented finesse tackle, but simply doesn't bring the thunder or play with the aggressiveness you want to see from your franchise right tackle. Martin is much more natural playing on the left side, and should the Chiefs at this juncture decide that they aren't going to want to pay Branden Albert "franchise LT" money, bringing in Martin to eventually replace him is logical. I think Martin can thrive on the left side. He is out of place on the right. As I am of the opinion that the Chiefs should pay Albert rather than let him walk, I do not advocate taking Martin. NT Dontari Poe, Memphis After watching Poe on tape and catching his Combine performance, I think that he could have a dynamic NFL career if he lands in the right system with the right coach. And he will need both in order to be successful. It's pretty clear he lacks discipline, and has been getting by at this point on his size and amazing measurables. I don't think he's a two-gapper. He showed absolutely zero flashes to drop anchor in his time in Memphis. His technique is somewhere in the vicinity of nonexistant, and while that not mean much in a one-gap 3-4 defense where the objective is to penetrate and beat offensive lineman, a ton of technique is required to absorb blockers and eat up space like two-gap 3-4 defenses demand. ILB Luke Kuechly, Boston College I actually think Kuechly might be worth the #11 overall. I think he has the potential to be an impact interior linebacker in this league. The problem is that he's not a natural thumper. He's much more of an athletic, all-purpose linebacker in the vein of Derrick Johnson. And, well, we already have a Derrick Johnson. You need the other ILB spot in Crennel's 3-4 defense to be a line of scrimmage destroyer like Jovan Belcher. OLB/ILB Courtney Upshaw, Alabama Speaking of a thumper: Courtney Upshaw. Upshaw is a large-sized OLB with experience in Alabama's 3-4, where he was utilized all over the field as a down-lineman, an outside rusher, and an interior line-pounder. Upshaw's versatility could be a big boost for Kansas City's defense, particularly if you believe Jovan Belcher is a weak link. A starting lineup of Hali-Upshaw-Johnson-Houston could be one of the best in the league. The problem is that Upshaw doesn't look like a linebacker. He's not terribly slow, but his footwork and his athleticism look like that of an athletic down-lineman in a 4-3, and aren't on par with what you want from a linebacker. He just doesn't look the part unless he finds a way to drop 15-20 lbs and retain his power. Players Worth Selecting RB Trent Richardson, Alabama WHY SELECT HIM: Richardson is a game-changing RB prospect on par with Adrian Peterson. He can be used in all three downs, and does it all: he can pound the line of scrimmage, he can get the tough yardage, he can glide in space and eat up yardage, he can pick up the blitz, he can receive out of the backfield. And combined with the similar all-around package of Jamaal Charles, who is smaller but also capable of running between the tackles, the Chiefs would have the best run game in the NFL by far. The pick would transform Matt Cassel into his Pro Bowl self from 2010, as Cassel only plays up to his maximum ability when the Chiefs can run the ball. Pairing Richardson with Charles ensures that transformation. WHY NOT TO: Running back is a brutal position with a short shelf-life. I personally believe that Richardson could buck this trend as he is a legendary worker in the weight room. You could get a Maurice Jones-Drew career out of him very easily, I believe. OT Riley Reiff, Iowa WHY SELECT HIM: Reiff offers the most tackle flexibility of any of the Tier A tackles; Kalil and Martin can't play the right side, and Adams can't play the left. Reiff has the athleticism and technique to play the left side adequately, but he has the strength, power, and attitude to be a picture-perfect right tackle in the zone blocking system. This pick is the best of all worlds to solve the Chiefs' desperate tackle situation -- it gives them a ten-year, rock-solid starter at the right tackle position, while picking up insurance in case Branden Albert holds out in 2013. Reiff is not ideal for the left side, but he can play anywhere on the line, and is one of the surest picks in the draft this side of Andrew Luck. WHY NOT TO: Unlike a couple of the other options at this point, Richardson and DeCastro, Reiff is not an all-time prospect at his position. He's just a very good prospect. So this, of course, begs the question: do you take a very good player at a more important position (OT), or do you take a phenomenal player at a less important position (OG, RB)? OT/OG Cordy Glenn, Georgia WHY SELECT HIM: If Reiff is the guy with the highest floor, Glenn is the guy with the highest ceiling. Glenn is someone you select if you believe Branden Albert is your franchise right tackle, and now you're just looking for someone to be able to similarly dominate at right tackle. Glenn's potential is limitless -- he's got some of the longest arms of the draft class, still benched as much as anybody despite those arms, and runs a 5.0 40 yard dash. His footwork in pass protection can be improved, and his run-blocking has the potential to be peerless at right tackle. WHY NOT TO: There is a bust factor that's much higher than everybody else on this list. Glenn was never an outstanding pass protector at Georgia, though he was always a devastating run blocker. You typically don't like to have to spend tons of time reconstructing the habits of your #11 overall draft pick. OG David DeCastro, Stanford WHY SELECT HIM: Grouped with Albert, Hudson, and Asamoah, you would have an offensive line grouping (along with a RT of your choosing) that could last for close to a decade. But unlike those three players, DeCastro is not merely another piece to the puzzle; he could be the cornerstone of your line. A methodical, brutal blocker, DeCastro can neutralize nose tackles and chase down linebackers at the second level. He was Stanford's franchise player in the run-game, and he almost single-handedly plowed the Trees' run game. The Chiefs need the run game to be successful for Cassel to play well, and DeCastro offers you an elite, All Pro talent at the position that can keep Matt Cassel clean from Day One. WHY NOT TO: You can find an extremely talented guards all over the NFL Draft, and free agency is loaded with them. You should not have to spend the #11 pick on a guard. DeCastro is a "franchise" guard, but what is that really worth when merely "really good" guards can also get the job done? OLB Nick Perry, USC WHY SELECT HIM: Because the Giants proved a passrush is truly the 1B need of a championship football team (quarterback being 1A, of course). Right now the Chiefs have a good team in Tamba Hali and Justin Houston, but (a.) Houston is not a sure thing, and has only really had one very good month as a rookie, and (b.) if either of these players go down with injury, the Chiefs find themselves mired in the same problem they've had for ages. Perry is a super-athlete, and has more drop-back ability than Houston. He is raw, but his elite athleticism make him the perfect versatile weapon for Crennel to tool with in any package he can possibly dream up. WHY NOT TO: The Chiefs do, nonetheless, sport two very solid passrushers, while sporting desperate holes at a few other positions that the players above would address. Perry is a smart pick if you're not confident in Houston's development, but I am personally quite confident in Justin Houston. But Richardson at 11 isn't ideal, right? Right. As plenty of the names above indicate, the Chiefs can trade down as many as ten spots and still be in golden position to land much of the above talent. Trading down is the best possible solution. If trading down is not possible, and Richardson is available, you take him and you sleep like a baby. After him, I'd probably take Reiff, and then DeCastro. But I'd be completely happy with either Glenn or Perry.
Posts: 59,693

03-04-2012, 08:23 PM	#46
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-675936	Up or down? Only reason I would take Richardson is based on Charles injury and injury history. Richardson is a monster who could handle a ton of carries if you need him to. I'm not sure that he woudln't end up being better than Charles.
Posts: 84,209

03-04-2012, 09:05 PM	#48
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-675936	Better than Charles is kind of a bad use of words. I think he could be more complete than Charles. I don't think there is a RB duty that he guy can't do at a top level. If I'm not mistaken, he just had his knee scoped. A knee he hurt earlier in the season but played with it for a little while. I get the rb stuff, but IMO he's one of the top 4 or 5 talents in the draft. It would be hard to pass that up.
Posts: 84,209

03-04-2012, 09:24 PM	#50
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-675936	I could get on board with RGIII, if we use the rest of our late picks to do some damage. Which is possible as this is a deep draft.
Posts: 84,209

03-04-2012, 11:22 PM	#51
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-675936	You really think they will move up for RGIII?
Posts: 84,209

03-04-2012, 11:38 PM	#53
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-675936	Would you do it Sac? I think I would if we can keep our picks from the 3 on this year.
Posts: 84,209