Chiefs To the drafturbators... - Page 5

Hootie · 09-13-2010, 11:23 PM

**** you guys!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

we won because...

?

2010 draft class.

AND

Mark Sanchez?

He almost makes Matt Cassel look good!

(Nah, that's an exaggeration!)

Hahahahahahaha!!!

What a great feeling.

CLOUD
9

-King- · 09-13-2010, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

how do you have credibility?

gholston
clausen
campbell

mocking my suggestion for mccluster to split return duties...

seriously

where is all this credential you think you have coming from?

how do you have credential to judge my credential?

huh?

answer me that

He was right about Sanchez being a franchis..... oh damn nevermind.

Hootie · 09-13-2010, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

....

...

THESE ARE ALL FROM THE FIRST DAY YOU DUMB ****ING HYPOCRITE...

POST THE POSTS AFTER THE MCCLUSTER POST...

POST THE POSTS FROM DRAFT DAY WHEN CLAUSEN WAS FALLING WHERE I WAS CLEARLY QUESTIONING WHETHER OR NOT TEAMS REALLY VIEWED HIM AS A PROSPECT...

I CLEARLY SAID...DOZENS OF TIMES...HE FELL TO 48 FOR A REASON...

SO

DUDE...

SERIOUSLY....

You're a joke.

POST THE POSTS AFTER THE MCCLUSTER PICK...THE FOUR AFTER THE ONE YOU CHERRYPICKED...OR GTFO! YOU ****ING HYPORCRITE...

DO IT!

I DARE YOU.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-13-2010, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Sorry, but there were no gaping holes with any consistency. The Chiefs front seven played very well. I won't say dominated, but they came pretty close to that mark.

Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

Bunit · 09-13-2010, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

I, um, what?

Yes. His return TD is one of the central reasons why the Chiefs won tonight. Also, post #4.

Cool man, cool. But that is some bullshit about all the mother****er had to do was run to the endzone.

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:00 AM

hamas...

I'm reading them right now...

hahahaha

lets go dude

post them before i do...

you ****ing cherrypicking hypocritical fool...

trying to deflect the EXPONENTIAL blow this game has done to you on this board on to me...

hahahahahahahahahaha

**** you dude

**** you

you don't know shit

you're the biggest fraud...your whole group...

go weep my friend...

go weep you

and again

FAKE ****ING FAN

**dirk digler** · 09-14-2010, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

Actually they had 389 but who is counting..

And Mathews only had 75 yds and was pretty much a non factor except giving up the ball to us

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

won't even start on you...because deep down I know you're a true Chiefs fan...

but you stuck your foot in your mouth REAL DEEP this week

**Reaper16** · 09-14-2010, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunit

Cool man, cool. But that is some bullshit about all the mother****er had to do was run to the endzone.

I keep on watching replays of that return. He made a cut that wasn't special by any means. The TD was set up by good blocking and terrible coverage on the part of the Chargers. It isn't like Arenas (or Charles) wouldn't have been able to score on that return. I'm still in favor of Arenas handling the full-time return duties.

Mecca · 09-14-2010, 12:02 AM

Did Hootie really make a thread so he could pull the fan card? Impressive.

-King- · 09-14-2010, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Actually they had 389 but who is counting..

And Mathews only had 75 yds and was pretty much a non factor except giving up the ball to us

But but but, Dane said he'd have 170 yards rushing and 50 yards receiving and 3 TDs!! What happened?

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:03 AM

it's exactly what I said...

teams never beat us with the run last year...

they used the pass to set up their run...

teams will beat us with the pass this year...or not beat us at all

the only reason our run numbers were so bad was because we were a bad team...that's it...

if we lost tonight I knew the only way was if Rivers tore us apart...he played a decent game...

but that weather really threw him off for 2/3 of the game...

he missed easy throws

mathews gave us momentum

we stole a victory

but that's ok

we have work to do...

but like herm says

WE CAN BUILD ON THIS!

NO DOUBT

cleveland next week...

who ISN'T optimistic?

**notorious** · 09-14-2010, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

Almost 400.

Hey, they doubled us up!

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Actually they had 389 but who is counting..

And Mathews only had 75 yds and was pretty much a non factor except giving up the ball to us

Rivers 298
Matthews 75
Tolbert 26
Rivers 5
Sproles 3

407 yards.

Dorsey, DJ and Flowers were outstanding and Smith was good at the NT spot.

Bunit · 09-14-2010, 12:04 AM

[QUOTE=Reaper16;7003540]I keep on watching replays of that return. He made a cut that wasn't special by any means. The TD was set up by good blocking and terrible coverage on the part of the Chargers. It isn't like Arenas (or Charles) wouldn't have been able to score on that return. I'm still in favor of Arenas handling the full-time return duties.[/QU

I am saying that you seem to be knocking the mother****er in some pussy passive aggressive way because you didn't like the ****ing pick and are looking for some hope of vindication.

That be what I'm saying.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing

But but but, Dane said he'd have 170 yards rushing and 50 yards receiving and 3 TDs!! What happened?

I think you know what happened.

09-13-2010, 11:23 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	To the drafturbators... **** you guys! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA we won because... ? 2010 draft class. AND Mark Sanchez? He almost makes Matt Cassel look good! (Nah, that's an exaggeration!) Hahahahahahaha!!! What a great feeling. CLOUD 9
Posts: 56,356

09-14-2010, 12:00 AM	#65
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	hamas... I'm reading them right now... hahahaha lets go dude post them before i do... you **ing cherrypicking hypocritical fool... trying to deflect the EXPONENTIAL blow this game has done to you on this board on to me... hahahahahahahahahaha you dude you you don't know shit you're the biggest fraud...your whole group... go weep my friend... go weep you and again FAKE **ING FAN
Posts: 56,356

09-14-2010, 12:02 AM	#69
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-512950	Did Hootie really make a thread so he could pull the fan card? Impressive.
Posts: 115,257

09-14-2010, 12:03 AM	#71
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	it's exactly what I said... teams never beat us with the run last year... they used the pass to set up their run... teams will beat us with the pass this year...or not beat us at all the only reason our run numbers were so bad was because we were a bad team...that's it... if we lost tonight I knew the only way was if Rivers tore us apart...he played a decent game... but that weather really threw him off for 2/3 of the game... he missed easy throws mathews gave us momentum we stole a victory but that's ok we have work to do... but like herm says WE CAN BUILD ON THIS! NO DOUBT cleveland next week... who ISN'T optimistic?
Posts: 56,356

09-14-2010, 12:04 AM	#74
Bunit Starter Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Wilmington, NC Casino cash: $10004900	[QUOTE=Reaper16;7003540]I keep on watching replays of that return. He made a cut that wasn't special by any means. The TD was set up by good blocking and terrible coverage on the part of the Chargers. It isn't like Arenas (or Charles) wouldn't have been able to score on that return. I'm still in favor of Arenas handling the full-time return duties.[/QU I am saying that you seem to be knocking the mother**er in some pussy passive aggressive way because you didn't like the **ing pick and are looking for some hope of vindication. That be what I'm saying.
Posts: 198