What position do we need the most in the first round?

[googlegoogle]

Half of you were saying LT.

Is that still true?

Dline?

[KCChiefsMan]

Taylor Mays or Eric Berry

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsMan

Taylor Mays or Eric Berry

This. Nothing else matters at this point.

[OnTheWarpath15]

We need players at almost every position, therefore you take the best player/playmaker available.

This team needs talent, not to reach for need - again.

[KCChiefsMan]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

We need players at almost every position, therefore you take the best player/playmaker available.

This team needs talent, not to reach for need - again.

yup

[chiefs1111]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

We need players at almost every position, therefore you take the best player/playmaker available.

This team needs talent, not to reach for need - again.

This a million times over

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

We need players at almost every position, therefore you take the best player/playmaker available.

This team needs talent, not to reach for need - again.

Absolutely. The word "need" should be removed from the drafting lexicon for the next 5 years.

[DBOSHO]

mays or berry. no question.

we can get oline later in the draft or FA

[Micjones]

Originally Posted by DBOSHO

mays or berry. no question.

we can get oline later in the draft or FA

The two are such amazing prospects.
I think you're right. To get that kind of talent at any position would be a coup for this front office.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

The Chiefs will not have a winning record until they fix their offensive line. It isn't Pioli's fault that Carl drafted a guard in the first round a few years ago. If there is a LT worthy of a top 5 pick the Chiefs should take him.

Originally Posted by RedThat

I agree good post

And so it begins...

[jspchief]

Originally Posted by DBOSHO

we can get oline later in the draft or FA

Which explains why there are so many teams with horrible O-lines

[Bane]

Clearly OL,but everyone will say you don't take a OL with as high a 1st round pick as we will have.I think after taking Tyson Jackson at 3 we cant do any worse a pick in the first round if we go OL.I voted for going with Berry with our first rounder in a recent poll on here though.

[The_Doctor10]

Originally Posted by bane_58

Clearly OL,but everyone will say you don't take a OL with as high a 1st round pick as we will have.I think after taking Tyson Jackson at 3 we cant do any worse a pick in the first round if we go OL.I voted for going with Berry with our first rounder in a recent poll on here though.

I'm not advocating LT or OL, but Jake Long and Joe Thomas would disagree with you there....


The Chiefs are bereft of talent at every single position, so go BPA, as everyone else has already said.

[Bane]

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury

I'm not advocating LT or OL, but Jake Long and Joe Thomas would disagree with you there....


The Chiefs are bereft of talent at every single position, so go BPA, as everyone else has already said.

We can agree on that,clearly we need playmakers at more than just the OL position.

[bevischief]

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury

I'm not advocating LT or OL, but Jake Long and Joe Thomas would disagree with you there....


The Chiefs are bereft of talent at every single position, so go BPA, as everyone else has already said.

This