If Mike Williams is on the board, should we take him?

[Red Dawg]

I say yes, even though our defense is terrible. I would not pass up a chance at a possible super star on offense. If not him then I would take Rolle.

[ILChief]

Originally Posted by Daddy T

I say yes, even though our defense is terrible. I would not pass up a chance at a possible super star on offense. If not him then I would take Rolle.

NO! If we take a WR with Rolle on the board there will be a 9 iron through my TV.

[teedubya]

i dont want Rolle with a Derrick Johnson available... Rolle is a cb, and even the best get burned toast like Chump Bailey... I want a stud in our LB corps for the next 10 years.

[crispystl]

I agree I want Derick Johnson also.

[Gaz]

Are you in the “our Super Bowl window is closing” group?
If so, you go Defense, Defense, Defense [although I would go MLB, rather than CB].

Are you in the “it is over; rebuild now” group?
Then you take BBA, regardless of position.

What’s in YOUR head?

xoxo~
Gaz
Sees a Super Bowl opportunity with a better D.

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by Gaz

Are you in the “our Super Bowl window is closing” group?
If so, you go Defense, Defense, Defense [although I would go MLB, rather than CB].

Are you in the “it is over; rebuild now” group?
Then you take BBA, regardless of position.

What’s in YOUR head?

xoxo~
Gaz
Sees a Super Bowl opportunity with a better D.

There aren't too many good MLB's in this draft, and certainly none worthy of picking in the first round. IMO.

[Saulbadguy]

Mike Williams is a slow(er) possesion type receiver, who has been out of football for a year. Nope.

If Antrelle Rolle and Derrick Johnson are gone, Braylon Edwards could be a good WR choice.

[Eleazar]

Damn it, NO freaking offense in the first round.

That being said I think Braylon Edwards could be as good as Mike Williams, hasn't been sitting for a year, and could be had lower in the first round.

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by Cochise

Damn it, NO freaking offense in the first round.

That being said I think Braylon Edwards could be as good as Mike Williams, hasn't been sitting for a year, and could be had lower in the first round.

Faster as well. I don't think he will last until the late first, though. It would be nice if Mark Clayton would drop to the 2nd round.

It all really depends on our position. If we are in the top 10, and

1) Derrick Johnson is gone
2) Rolle is gone
3) Marlin Jackson is gone

I'd say go with a WR, or maybe even a LT.

[Eleazar]

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Faster as well. I don't think he will last until the late first, though. It would be nice if Mark Clayton would drop to the 2nd round.

It all really depends on our position. If we are in the top 10, and

1) Derrick Johnson is gone
2) Rolle is gone
3) Marlin Jackson is gone

I'd say go with a WR, or maybe even a LT.

I would love to see Edwards wearing red but with gaping holes like we have on defense I think picking offense is inexcusable.

We need a linebacker who can play sideline to sideline, I think is our number 1 need. We need our Ray Lewis, our Brian Urlacher, our Zach Thomas, Julian Peterson, one of those types of guys.

[philfree]

I read that Williams has to be careful to not eat himself into a TE. I say stay away from this guy. We have Gonzo and Wilson as pass catching TEs we don't need a third. We need a 6'3" WR with 4.4 speed and good route running ability not a 4th TE.

PhilFree

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by Cochise

I would love to see Edwards wearing red but with gaping holes like we have on defense I think picking offense is inexcusable.

We need a linebacker who can play sideline to sideline, I think is our number 1 need. We need our Ray Lewis, our Brian Urlacher, our Zach Thomas, Julian Peterson, one of those types of guys.

Derrick Johnson. He should be our #1 priority. He isn't a MLB though, like Ray, Brian, or Zach. Like I said before, I don't think there are any MLB's worthy of picking in the first round of this draft.

[Chiefnj]

I've read that Williams really isn't that fast. I'm not sure he's worthy of a top 10 pick.

I think one of the problems that the Chiefs will face if they have a top 5 or top 10 pick is the fact that positions of need might not be represented at those picks. I don't think there are any MLB's ranked that high nor any DE's in the top 5. That leaves corner and OLB. It'll be an interesting draft day if Rolle or Johnson are taken before KC picks.

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj

I've read that Williams really isn't that fast. I'm not sure he's worthy of a top 10 pick.

I think one of the problems that the Chiefs will face if they have a top 5 or top 10 pick is the fact that positions of need might not be represented at those picks. I don't think there are any MLB's ranked that high nor any DE's in the top 5. That leaves corner and OLB. It'll be an interesting draft day if Rolle or Johnson are taken before KC picks.

He's the next Keyshawn Johnson. Tall, slow, lanky USC possesion receiver. Not that that is bad, it fits many kinds of offenses, just not ours.

DE's there are plenty of, but almost NO MLB's.

[the Talking Can]

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

He's the next Keyshawn Johnson. Tall, slow, lanky USC possesion receiver. Not that that is bad, it fits many kinds of offenses, just not ours.

DE's there are plenty of, but almost NO MLB's.

sounds better than our slow, pass dropping 30 year old WRs....Williams catches everything and he is plenty fast for the NFL....speed is so over rated