Michael Irvin is an idiot

**banyon** · 02-06-2006, 10:45 PM

On Sprotscenter, just listed "Broncos with T.O." as the 3rd best team in football behind Indy and Pit.

Why is he still on my T.V. every other day?

greg63 · 02-06-2006, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon

Michael Irvin is an idiot

Your just now figuring this out?

KCWolfman · 02-06-2006, 10:58 PM

I remember last pre-season how everyone touted Randy Moss vastly improving the offense of the raiduhs.

You can have a full gross of high caliber bullets, but if you don't have a decent gun they are wasted. The same is true of WRs and QBs.

jspchief · 02-06-2006, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCWolfman

I remember last pre-season how everyone touted Randy Moss vastly improving the offense of the raiduhs.

You can have a full gross of high caliber bullets, but if you don't have a decent gun they are wasted. The same is true of WRs and QBs.

Not to mention no way to stop your opponents bullets.

Jim Jones · 02-06-2006, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCWolfman

I remember last pre-season how everyone touted Randy Moss vastly improving the offense of the raiduhs.

You can have a full gross of high caliber bullets, but if you don't have a decent gun they are wasted. The same is true of WRs and QBs.

Well to be fair, Oakland didn't make the AFC Championship the year before.

KCWolfman · 02-06-2006, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Jones

Well to be fair, Oakland didn't make the AFC Championship the year before.

And denver didn't get past the AFC championship mainly because of their Gun/QB.

While T.O. would be an improvement on the physical side, especially with the aging of Smith, they still would have his attitude to deal with (see Clinton Portis) and still don't have a real threat at QB to make that much of a difference (IMO).

Calcountry · 02-07-2006, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCWolfman

And denver didn't get past the AFC championship mainly because of their Gun/QB.

While T.O. would be an improvement on the physical side, especially with the aging of Smith, they still would have his attitude to deal with (see Clinton Portis) and still don't have a real threat at QB to make that much of a difference (IMO).

Its great to see you here dude.

jspchief · 02-06-2006, 11:10 PM

Denver still has a terrible secondary, that gets completely exposed if a team can neutralize the blitz like Pittsburgh did.

Terrell Owens isn't a CB.

**Dunit35** · 02-07-2006, 12:02 AM

Michael Irvin is a moron. He should not be allowed into the Hall for atleast 10-15 more years, if ever.

Mecca · 02-07-2006, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35

Michael Irvin is a moron. He should not be allowed into the Hall for atleast 10-15 more years, if ever.

Well, idiot or not, he does have Hall of Fame stats.......

KCTitus · 02-07-2006, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunit35

Michael Irvin is a moron. He should not be allowed into the Hall for atleast 10-15 more years, if ever.

The local sports talkers were discussing Irvin's HOF credentials, and it was noted his numbers were the same as Andre Rison's. Does that mean that SB rings are the deciding factor? I hope not.

greg63 · 02-07-2006, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCTitus

The local sports talkers were discussing Irvin's HOF credentials, and it was noted his numbers were the same as Andre Rison's. Does that mean that SB rings are the deciding factor? I hope not.

...Almost certainly.

KCTitus · 02-07-2006, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg63

...Almost certainly.

Being part of a SB winning team should not be an automatic entrance into the HOF.

Does that make Neil Smith HOF material where DT is not?

greg63 · 02-07-2006, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Being part of a SB winning team should not be an automatic entrance into the HOF.

Does that make Neil Smith HOF material where DT is not?

...Not in my opinion; too bad it doesn't count for anything.

kcxiv · 02-07-2006, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banyon

On Sprotscenter, just listed "Broncos with T.O." as the 3rd best team in football behind Indy and Pit.

Why is he still on my T.V. every other day?

What team is better then Denver thats not Indy and Pitt? Seattle "maybe" other then that. i dont see another.

02-06-2006, 10:45 PM	Topic Starter
banyon Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hermosa, SD Casino cash: $10176551	Michael Irvin is an idiot On Sprotscenter, just listed "Broncos with T.O." as the 3rd best team in football behind Indy and Pit. Why is he still on my T.V. every other day?
Posts: 44,355

02-06-2006, 10:58 PM	#3
KCWolfman Fall down 7 times, get up 8 Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	I remember last pre-season how everyone touted Randy Moss vastly improving the offense of the raiduhs. You can have a full gross of high caliber bullets, but if you don't have a decent gun they are wasted. The same is true of WRs and QBs.
Posts: 15,474

02-06-2006, 11:10 PM	#8
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Denver still has a terrible secondary, that gets completely exposed if a team can neutralize the blitz like Pittsburgh did. Terrell Owens isn't a CB.
Posts: 27,207

02-07-2006, 12:02 AM	#9
Dunit35 Keepin it Real Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Oklahoma Casino cash: $-2142955	Michael Irvin is a moron. He should not be allowed into the Hall for atleast 10-15 more years, if ever.
Posts: 10,507