U.S. Issues 911 was an inside job.

Taco John · 02-08-2006, 11:06 PM

After watching this, I am once and for all convinced that it was an inside job...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801

The evidence is way too strong.

Lurch · 02-08-2006, 11:09 PM

LOL.....welcome to Neptune. People can believe crap like this, but they can't believe that Sadaam sent WMDs to Syria on trucks prior to the arrival of American troops. Yeeeee-Haaaawwwww.

Taco John · 02-08-2006, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurch

LOL.....welcome to Neptune. People can believe crap like this, but they can't believe that Sadaam sent WMDs to Syria on trucks prior to the arrival of American troops. Yeeeee-Haaaawwwww.

It's all about the evidence with me.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 02-09-2006, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

It's all about the evidence with me.

It's a long video, and unfortunately it's 2 am here. I'll definitely watch more of it when I get the chance.

Nightwish · 02-09-2006, 01:14 AM

Some of the stuff in there is something of a stretch, but some of it is very well-researched and fairly compelling. I'm doubting that Lurch bothered to watch more than five minutes of it.

Taco John · 02-09-2006, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish

Some of the stuff in there is something of a stretch, but some of it is very well-researched and fairly compelling. I'm doubting that Lurch bothered to watch more than five minutes of it.

I posted the thread at 10:06. He posted at 10:09...

Typical Knee Jerk without considering the evidence that you would expect from someone of his ilk...

Nightwish · 02-09-2006, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I posted the thread at 10:06. He posted at 10:09...

Typical Knee Jerk without considering the evidence that you would expect from someone of his ilk...

LOL!!! I was close!

Lurch · 02-09-2006, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I posted the thread at 10:06. He posted at 10:09...

Typical Knee Jerk without considering the evidence that you would expect from someone of his ilk...

The thing has been around for a long time already....at least since last early last month. And this is the second edition. I filed it the same place I did Oliver Stone's JFK, the claims of the faked moon landings, and the Holocaust as a hoaxes. Don't forget your tinfoil hat on the way out the door this morning....

**banyon** · 02-18-2006, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurch

LOL.....welcome to Neptune. People can believe crap like this, but they can't believe that Sadaam sent WMDs to Syria on trucks prior to the arrival of American troops. Yeeeee-Haaaawwwww.

Wonder if when he posted this he thought this thread would go on for another 62 pages?

Taco John · 02-09-2006, 12:21 AM

The segment on the collapse of the buildings is what finally did it for me. It's the longest segment, but well worth the watch. Especially at the climax of it when they start highlighting the detonations.

The detonations... wow. Watch those and tell me the building wasn't rigged.

**banyon** · 02-09-2006, 12:52 AM

The one thing that's never made any sense to me...

Why didn't the SEC investigate the record selling short on the airline stocks for insider knowledge?

I mean when it comes to Martha Stewart, we're going to bring down the hammer, but whoever made megabucks off of 9-11, let's just drop that?

Taco John · 02-09-2006, 01:31 AM

I'm curious what you find to be a stretch... Everything they covered is fairly well documented. SOme of the stuff they cover raises some questions that would lead the mind to stretch. But like I said... They document pretty much everything.

Nightwish · 02-09-2006, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I'm curious what you find to be a stretch... Everything they covered is fairly well documented. SOme of the stuff they cover raises some questions that would lead the mind to stretch. But like I said... They document pretty much everything.

I'll have to get back to you on that. There were a couple things in there that I thought could be explained away in other ways, but I don't remember specifically what they were. I'll have to watch it again tomorrow when I'm less tired.

Edit: I do remember one of them. The part about the Pentagon, and the clipped light poles, when he was comparing how a much smaller plane got ripped to pieces clipping one, but a 757 clipping eight of them didn't leave any debris. I didn't think that was a real sound comparison, because the wings on a 757 would presumably be a lot stronger than a smaller aircraft. But what they said about the 6-ton titanium engines that have a higher melting point than the top burning temperature of jet fuel, and didn't even leave a dent in the wall or shatter the glass certainly makes one wonder.

The jet fuel was another thing I wasn't sure about. He said jet fuel is the same as kerosene. I'm not sure about the accuracy of that. I know the fuel they use in military jets is definitely different from kerosene, much more dangerous and caustic. I don't know about commercial airliners, though.

Taco John · 02-09-2006, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightwish

The jet fuel was another thing I wasn't sure about. He said jet fuel is the same as kerosene. I'm not sure about the accuracy of that.

From the US Centennial of Flight Commission:

The invention of jet engines created another challenge for engine designers. They did not require a fuel that vaporized (turned to a gaseous state) as easily as AvGas, but they did have other requirements. Instead of using gasoline, they chose kerosene or a kerosene-gasoline mix. The first jet fuel was known as JP-1 (for "Jet Propellant"), but the U.S. military soon sought fuels with better qualities. They wanted fuels that did not produce visible smoke and which were also less likely to produce contrails (the visible trail of condensed water vapor or ice crystals caused when water condenses in aircraft exhaust at certain altitudes). But a major requirement was for fuels that did not ignite at low temperatures in order to reduce the chance of fire.

Further into the article:
Commercial jet fuel, known as Jet-A, is pure kerosene and has a flashpoint of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius). It is a high-quality fuel, however, and if it fails the purity and other quality tests for use on jet aircraft, it is sold to other ground-based users with less demanding requirements, like railroad engines. Commercial jet fuel as well as military jet fuel often includes anti-freeze to prevent ice buildup inside the fuel tanks.

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...uel/Tech21.htm

Taco John · 02-09-2006, 02:22 AM

The video footage starting at 51 minutes and 45 seconds is some of the most compelling evidence I've seen of this being a planned demolition.

02-08-2006, 11:06 PM	Topic Starter
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084482	911 was an inside job. After watching this, I am once and for all convinced that it was an inside job... http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801 The evidence is way too strong.
Posts: 49,357

02-08-2006, 11:09 PM	#2
Lurch You rang? Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Greenbriar, USA Casino cash: $1297	LOL.....welcome to Neptune. People can believe crap like this, but they can't believe that Sadaam sent WMDs to Syria on trucks prior to the arrival of American troops. Yeeeee-Haaaawwwww. __________________ Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
Posts: 1,538

02-09-2006, 01:14 AM	#5
Nightwish 2006 Snipe Hunting Champion Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: A van down by the river! Casino cash: $4150	Some of the stuff in there is something of a stretch, but some of it is very well-researched and fairly compelling. I'm doubting that Lurch bothered to watch more than five minutes of it. __________________ "Human tales? But human don't have tails, they have big, big bottoms that they wear with bad shorts, and walk around going, 'Hi, Helen!'" -- Batty (Robin Williams), in Fern Gully
Posts: 7,013

02-09-2006, 12:21 AM	#10
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084482	The segment on the collapse of the buildings is what finally did it for me. It's the longest segment, but well worth the watch. Especially at the climax of it when they start highlighting the detonations. The detonations... wow. Watch those and tell me the building wasn't rigged. __________________ Ehyeh asher ehyeh.
Posts: 49,357

02-09-2006, 12:52 AM	#11
banyon Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Dodge City, Kansas Casino cash: $76625	The one thing that's never made any sense to me... Why didn't the SEC investigate the record selling short on the airline stocks for insider knowledge? I mean when it comes to Martha Stewart, we're going to bring down the hammer, but whoever made megabucks off of 9-11, let's just drop that? __________________
Posts: 32,045

02-09-2006, 01:31 AM	#12
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084482	I'm curious what you find to be a stretch... Everything they covered is fairly well documented. SOme of the stuff they cover raises some questions that would lead the mind to stretch. But like I said... They document pretty much everything. __________________ Ehyeh asher ehyeh.
Posts: 49,357

02-09-2006, 02:22 AM	#15
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084482	The video footage starting at 51 minutes and 45 seconds is some of the most compelling evidence I've seen of this being a planned demolition. __________________ Ehyeh asher ehyeh.
Posts: 49,357

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode