Chiefs Why is Houston in coverage?

**petegz28** · 01-15-2017, 10:17 PM

2 significant plays on 3rd down and Houston is in coverage, not rushing the passer?

ARE YOU ****ING KIDDING ME, SUTTON?!?!?!?!?

**dannybcaitlyn** · 01-15-2017, 10:20 PM

Because Sutton ****ing sucks and we should have given Wade a blank check to come here. But we love the bend but don't break shit mixed with a offense that can't produce points. Bad ****ing combo!

RINGLEADER · 01-15-2017, 10:22 PM

Not only was he in coverage, he was in man coverage against Antonio Brown.

Anyway, the Chiefs will continue to do this year in and year out until Andy Reid is gone. I don't care how many regular season games he wins, he just can't get it done.

-King- · 01-15-2017, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER

Not only was he in coverage, he was in man coverage against Antonio Brown.

Anyway, the Chiefs will continue to do this year in and year out until Andy Reid is gone. I don't care how many regular season games he wins, he just can't get it done.

Yeah! And if our next coach doesn't win a super bowl his first 4 years, fire him too!!
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- · 01-15-2017, 10:23 PM

18 points. Defense did their job. It sucks that we lost on that play but blaming Sutton and the defense is just reeruned.
Posted via Mobile Device

OldSchool · 01-15-2017, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

18 points. Defense did their job. It sucks that we lost on that play but blaming Sutton and the defense is just reeruned.
Posted via Mobile Device

No they didn't. They allowed the Steelers to hold the ball and score on almost every single one of their drives.

They force 1 punt all game and couldn't force the Steelers to punt in the end.

-King- · 01-15-2017, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool

No they didn't. They allowed the Steelers to hold the ball and score on almost every single one of their drives.

They force 1 punt all game and couldn't force the Steelers to punt in the end.

Games are won and lost on points scored vs points allowed last time I checked. Steelers scored 18 points. That's more than enough for us to win.
Posted via Mobile Device

OldSchool · 01-15-2017, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Games are won and lost on points scored vs points allowed last time I checked. Steelers scored 18 points. That's more than enough for us to win.
Posted via Mobile Device

No it wasn't, not tonight.

They essentially allowed Pitt to play keep away all night long until the time ran out.

Yeah, the offense did shit but the loss wasn't all on them. Defense only forced 1 punt all night long and couldn't get off the field if their lives depended on it.

-King- · 01-15-2017, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool

No it wasn't, not tonight.

They essentially allowed Pitt to play keep away all night long until the time ran out.

Yeah, the offense did shit but the loss wasn't all on them. Defense only forced 1 punt all night long and couldn't get off the field if their lives depended on it.

They can do whatever they want and it wouldn't have mattered if we scored points too. It's easy to play keep away when our offense punted and committed turnovers on basically every drive.
Posted via Mobile Device

**Rausch** · 01-15-2017, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Games are won and lost on points scored vs points allowed last time I checked. Steelers scored 18 points. That's more than enough for us to win.
Posted via Mobile Device

It was a very Chiefs game.

WR's dropping passes.

Wide open WR's deep and Alex not ever noticing.

Penalties marching us backward and forcing long 3rd down conversions.

These problems have happened all season long, continued tonight, and are exactly why we lost...

OldSchool · 01-15-2017, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

It was a very Chiefs game.

WR's dropping passes.

Wide open WR's deep and Alex not ever noticing.

Penalties marching us backward and forcing long 3rd down conversions.

These problems have happened all season long, continued tonight, and are exactly why we lost...

Don't forget the shit sideways plays that only work once or twice all season long but keep getting called because Reid thinks that they're the same as running plays.

**SAGA45** · 01-16-2017, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

18 points. Defense did their job. It sucks that we lost on that play but blaming Sutton and the defense is just reeruned.
Posted via Mobile Device

Basically...

HolyHat · 01-16-2017, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

18 points. Defense did their job. It sucks that we lost on that play but blaming Sutton and the defense is just reeruned.
Posted via Mobile Device

While i mostly agree, Sutton is still a boob. Having Houston on Brown on the final play was possibly the dumbest move ive seen from this team and buddy, ive seeen it all

chiefzilla1501 · 01-16-2017, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrawny Armed Alex Smith

While i mostly agree, Sutton is still a boob. Having Houston on Brown on the final play was possibly the dumbest move ive seen from this team and buddy, ive seeen it all

Sutton didn't put Houston on Brown. Houston was spying Leveon Bell for the short screen who ended up going into pass pro. He ended up on Brown in zone coverage.

This wasn't an obvious pass situation. It was 3rd and 3. Leveon Bell was shredding us. I was a lot more worried about the run or the screen than I was the pass. Maybe if we had real coverage backers instead of relying on LBs we picked up off the street, we'd have more confidence in our LBs to make the kind of plays we asked Houston to make yesterday.

HolyHat · 01-16-2017, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Sutton didn't put Houston on Brown. Houston was spying Leveon Bell for the short screen who ended up going into pass pro. He ended up on Brown in zone coverage.

This wasn't an obvious pass situation. It was 3rd and 3. Leveon Bell was shredding us. I was a lot more worried about the run or the screen than I was the pass. Maybe if we had real coverage backers instead of relying on LBs we picked up off the street, we'd have more confidence in our LBs to make the kind of plays we asked Houston to make yesterday.

meh. not good enough. 3rd and 3 you rush your best pass rusher and force Ben into a split second decision.

01-15-2017, 10:17 PM	Topic Starter
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-915873	Why is Houston in coverage? 2 significant plays on 3rd down and Houston is in coverage, not rushing the passer? ARE YOU ****ING KIDDING ME, SUTTON?!?!?!?!?
Posts: 132,316

01-15-2017, 10:20 PM	#2
dannybcaitlyn Supporter Join Date: Oct 2004 Casino cash: $3214000	Because Sutton **ing sucks and we should have given Wade a blank check to come here. But we love the bend but don't break shit mixed with a offense that can't produce points. Bad **ing combo!
Posts: 7,713

01-15-2017, 10:22 PM	#3
RINGLEADER In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Confusion, USA Casino cash: $8070503	Not only was he in coverage, he was in man coverage against Antonio Brown. Anyway, the Chiefs will continue to do this year in and year out until Andy Reid is gone. I don't care how many regular season games he wins, he just can't get it done.
Posts: 48,488

01-15-2017, 10:23 PM	#5
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1234257	18 points. Defense did their job. It sucks that we lost on that play but blaming Sutton and the defense is just reeruned. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 65,458