What's so great about David Pollack? - Page 3

**RealSNR** · 02-24-2005, 06:42 PM

I've heard a lot of people pimping him. Why is he so great?

Spicy McHaggis · 02-25-2005, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

I'd probably prefer Pollack over James or Spears.

Pollack seemed to show up big in big games, where the other two guys seemed to disappear.

No contest IMO.

Spicy McHaggis · 02-25-2005, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater

i agree with the way he was rated has well But there is a chance he might not fall to us

Wilfork was projected top 10 last year and fell to the Pats. It is possible but who knows?

Chiefnj · 02-25-2005, 11:50 AM

If you belong to the draft school of thought that how you play in college is the #1 factor in how you project as a pro, then Pollack is worth a top 15 pick. This is the school of thought used by the Pats and guys like Polian.

If you put more stock in numbers and size he might fall. That's been the Chiefs draft school lately.

I'll opt for the former.

siberian khatru · 02-25-2005, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj

If you belong to the draft school of thought that how you play in college is the #1 factor in how you project as a pro, then Pollack is worth a top 15 pick. This is the school of thought used by the Pats and guys like Polian.

If you put more stock in numbers and size he might fall. That's been the Chiefs draft school lately.

I'll opt for the former.

BigChiefFan · 02-25-2005, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj

If you belong to the draft school of thought that how you play in college is the #1 factor in how you project as a pro, then Pollack is worth a top 15 pick. This is the school of thought used by the Pats and guys like Polian.

If you put more stock in numbers and size he might fall. That's been the Chiefs draft school lately.

I'll opt for the former.

Yep. The combine is a good tool and it does help answer some questions, but give me the FOOTBALL players who dominated against great competition every time. The combine should be secondary in the decision making process, IMO.

That said, Pollack should be there at 15 and we should pull the trigger. If not him, Carlos Rogers, but I prefer a DE.

ChiefsCountry · 02-25-2005, 12:50 PM

I think we should go DE in the first round, DE cost way too much on the open market. CB and LB would be better off in FA, and selecting a DE in the first round. I like Spears alittle more than Pollack. The upside is a little greater, but I wouldn't be mad at all if we got Pollack.

02-24-2005, 06:42 PM
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $-1314792	What's so great about David Pollack? I've heard a lot of people pimping him. Why is he so great?
Posts: 93,281

02-25-2005, 11:50 AM	#33
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	If you belong to the draft school of thought that how you play in college is the #1 factor in how you project as a pro, then Pollack is worth a top 15 pick. This is the school of thought used by the Pats and guys like Polian. If you put more stock in numbers and size he might fall. That's been the Chiefs draft school lately. I'll opt for the former. __________________ "I always tell (the assistant coaches), 'Make it simple, 'cause I'm stupid,'" Edwards said. "This ain't computer football." Herm Edwards, 3-20-07 Q: Herm, back on December 25th you were asked if Trent Green was your starter going into next season and you said, ‘yeah, why wouldn’t he be?’ Have you changed your mind on that? EDWARDS: No, I have not.” (1-11-07)
Posts: 6,811

02-25-2005, 12:50 PM	#36
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $-1371248	I think we should go DE in the first round, DE cost way too much on the open market. CB and LB would be better off in FA, and selecting a DE in the first round. I like Spears alittle more than Pollack. The upside is a little greater, but I wouldn't be mad at all if we got Pollack.
Posts: 51,990