do we still want Green over Huard? - Page 14

Hootie · 11-05-2006, 03:17 PM

I mean...this Huard guy is playing sensational football.

Great win today boys!

TRR · 11-05-2006, 08:36 PM

Huard is playing fantastic football, but he is really being leashed in by Solari and Co. I really believe KC threw out about half the playbook when Green went down. I would like to see Green leashed for a couple of games until he gets his feet wet, and then open up the O a bit.

There really isn't anything to discuss. Green is the starting QB when he's healthy, and I am happy with that. Green was never the problem in Kansas City.

Hootie · 11-05-2006, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox

In the playoffs, you don't get a chance to fix it.

oh, ok...

Hootie · 11-05-2006, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR

Huard is playing fantastic football, but he is really being leashed in by Solari and Co. I really believe KC threw out about half the playbook when Green went down. I would like to see Green leashed for a couple of games until he gets his feet wet, and then open up the O a bit.

There really isn't anything to discuss. Green is the starting QB when he's healthy, and I am happy with that. Green was never the problem in Kansas City.

Incredible.

Remember week 1 when we were trying to be something we weren't capable of being anymore and Herm said he was going to do what he knew how to do...

So that half of the playbook had nothing to do with losing Green and everything to do with Herm wanting to play his style of football...

redbrian · 11-05-2006, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR

Huard is playing fantastic football, but he is really being leashed in by Solari and Co. I really believe KC threw out about half the playbook when Green went down. I would like to see Green leashed for a couple of games until he gets his feet wet, and then open up the O a bit.

There really isn't anything to discuss. Green is the starting QB when he's healthy, and I am happy with that. Green was never the problem in Kansas City.

To expand on this who would give the Chiefs a better shot at winning in the post season, with out a doubt it would be Green.

Would not benifit Green to play as many games as he could prior to the post season?

Sure-Oz · 11-05-2006, 08:45 PM

Green didn't get any protection that game and still got 11-15 completions. The line has improved ALOT since he went down!

DRU · 11-05-2006, 08:53 PM

Hootie: Have you not appreciated what Green has done for this offense over the past few years? With the exception of Manning, he's been the BEST. And now you wanna bench him because our backup came in and did a great job..?? That's his job. He did it well. We should all be VERY thankful for that, and that we even have the opportunity to talk about possible playoffs, etc. given the fact that nobody thought we had a chance when Green went down. Why? Because he's the man!

Now, as GoChiefs pointed out earlier, Huard is second behind Manning. So now you're given the choice between 2 guys who have done a hell of a job given their chance. Who do you go with? EXPERIENCE!

Hootie · 11-05-2006, 08:58 PM

by your logic we should suit up James Hasty and put him in the secondary...

DRU · 11-05-2006, 09:00 PM

dude, that's a lame comparison and I think we all know it.

redbrian · 11-05-2006, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

by your logic we should suit up James Hasty and put him in the secondary...

wow how did you create that way back machine, is your name Sherman.

Sure-Oz · 11-05-2006, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

by your logic we should suit up James Hasty and put him in the secondary...

By your logic Huard should start, but Trent is a better QB, makes sense.

DRU · 11-05-2006, 09:10 PM

Quote:

By your logic Huard should start, but Trent is a better QB, makes sense.

This is interesting part of the whole argument. The only reason there's a question is because the team is winning games right now. Then you get that whole, well do you mess with it when it's doing ok...do you dissrupt the current flow...etc. Those are important questions that need to be considered, of course.

The fact of the matter is Green is the better QB. It's very hard to deny that. So the question becomes do you want your possible playoff bound team to be led by the guy who's been 2nd best in the league, week in, week out, for the past 4 years, or with the guy who's done well...this year. A guy who's had many chances to get his starting job and never could.

I think the answer is simple. And again, we can feel great knowing that Huard is right there ready to go when/if needed.

ChiefaRoo · 11-05-2006, 09:10 PM

Yes, we do. Damon is just about ready to run out of mojo.

Hammock Parties · 11-05-2006, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

Damon is just about ready to run out of mojo.

How do you know?

**KcMizzou** · 11-05-2006, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

How do you know?

The law of averages?

ChiefaRoo · 11-05-2006, 09:23 PM

He's had some close calls on INT's the past two games where he would of looked like a donkey if they would of been returned for a pick 6. I'm just feeling it. Bring back the golden boy.

11-05-2006, 03:17 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	do we still want Green over Huard? I mean...this Huard guy is playing sensational football. Great win today boys!
Posts: 56,356

11-05-2006, 08:36 PM	#196
TRR The Priest and I Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CO Casino cash: $9460185	Huard is playing fantastic football, but he is really being leashed in by Solari and Co. I really believe KC threw out about half the playbook when Green went down. I would like to see Green leashed for a couple of games until he gets his feet wet, and then open up the O a bit. There really isn't anything to discuss. Green is the starting QB when he's healthy, and I am happy with that. Green was never the problem in Kansas City.
Posts: 7,357

11-05-2006, 08:53 PM	#201
DRU To the Game Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $6793516	Hootie: Have you not appreciated what Green has done for this offense over the past few years? With the exception of Manning, he's been the BEST. And now you wanna bench him because our backup came in and did a great job..?? That's his job. He did it well. We should all be VERY thankful for that, and that we even have the opportunity to talk about possible playoffs, etc. given the fact that nobody thought we had a chance when Green went down. Why? Because he's the man! Now, as GoChiefs pointed out earlier, Huard is second behind Manning. So now you're given the choice between 2 guys who have done a hell of a job given their chance. Who do you go with? EXPERIENCE!
Posts: 2,124

11-05-2006, 08:58 PM	#202
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	by your logic we should suit up James Hasty and put him in the secondary...
Posts: 56,356

11-05-2006, 09:00 PM	#203
DRU To the Game Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $6793516	dude, that's a lame comparison and I think we all know it.
Posts: 2,124

11-05-2006, 09:10 PM	#207
ChiefaRoo MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Austin,TX Casino cash: $3937505	Yes, we do. Damon is just about ready to run out of mojo.
Posts: 11,953

11-05-2006, 09:23 PM	#210
ChiefaRoo MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Austin,TX Casino cash: $3937505	He's had some close calls on INT's the past two games where he would of looked like a donkey if they would of been returned for a pick 6. I'm just feeling it. Bring back the golden boy.
Posts: 11,953