I'm sick of this Biletnikoff stuff. SICK OF IT!

[Rain Man]

NFL Network was doing a list of the ten receivers with the best hands. Cris Carter was #1, which is not a bad call, and Raymond Berry was #2 and Steve Largent was #3. Larry Fitzgerald was #4, which was purely a media ploy.

But what really chafed me was #5. They named Fred Biletnikoff #3. Now, I'll acknowledge that he made a lot of catches, and with the help of artificial sticky substances he generally had good hands.

But for crying out loud, talk about an overrated receiver. Best hands? Hall of Fame? Gets a college award named after him? Let's compare him to the best receiver for his arch-rival, a fine gentleman named Otis Taylor.

Speed: Otis Taylor left that Raider in the dirt. Not even close.

Hands: Please. Otis Taylor by a mile. Watch the games.

Routes: Maybe even.

Big-Play Ability: Who turned a short pass into a long touchdown in a Super Bowl? Who? Otis.

Production: Over the course of their careers, Otis averaged 56 yards per game. That Raider averaged 47.

Size: Otis Taylor was a scary speciman. That Raider was small and skinny.

Blocking: See "size".

Long-term Dominance: Biletnikoff made 6 pro bowls and 2 all-pros. In those seasons, he averaged 49 catches for 781 yards. Otis made 3 pro bowls and 2 all-pros. In those seasons, he averaged 57 catches for 1076 yards.

Single-Season Dominance: Otis' best season was 58 catches for 1,297 yards and 8 TDs, averaging 22.4 yards per catch. Biletnikoff's best season was 61 catches for 1,037 yards and 17.0 yards per catch, with 6 TDs

Career Performance: Otis played in 130 games and made 410 catches for 7,306 yards and 57 TDs,17.8 yards per catch. Biletnikoff played in 190 games and made 589 catches for 8,974 yards and 76 TDs, with 15.2 yards per catch. See "longevity" below.

Longevity: This is the only area that the Raider wins, since he lasted 14 years, compared to Otis' 10 seasons (excluding one season where Otis was active but didn't catch any passes). Biletnikoff had 10 seasons where he caught 40+ passes, while Otis had 5.

So why does Biletnikoff get all the credit? He played longer, so he caught more passes. But in a typical game, Otis outplayed him, outgained him, and was a scarier guy to play against.

Man, it ticks me off that Otis doesn't get the attention, and that also-ran gets all the glory.

[T-post Tom]

Although he's not a WR, I'd put Tony G on par or better than anyone on the list.

[Rain Man]

Tony G. was actually mentioned as someone who "barely missed" being on the list.

[T-post Tom]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

Tony G. was actually mentioned as someone who "barely missed" being on the list.

Sacrilege!
























.

[88TG88]

NFL Network was doing a list of the ten receivers with the best hands. Cris Carter was #1, which is not a bad call, and Raymond Berry was #2 and Steve Largent was #3. Larry Fitzgerald was #4, which was purely a media ploy.

But what really chafed me was #5. They named Fred Biletnikoff #3. Now, I'll acknowledge that he made a lot of catches, and with the help of artificial sticky substances he generally had good hands.

But for crying out loud, talk about an overrated receiver. Best hands? Hall of Fame? Gets a college award named after him? Let's compare him to the best receiver for his arch-rival, a fine gentleman named Otis Taylor.

Speed: Otis Taylor left that Raider in the dirt. Not even close.

Hands: Please. Otis Taylor by a mile. Watch the games.

Routes: Maybe even.

Big-Play Ability: Who turned a short pass into a long touchdown in a Super Bowl? Who? Otis.

Production: Over the course of their careers, Otis averaged 56 yards per game. That Raider averaged 47.

Size: Otis Taylor was a scary speciman. That Raider was small and skinny.

Blocking: See "size".

Long-term Dominance: Biletnikoff made 6 pro bowls and 2 all-pros. In those seasons, he averaged 49 catches for 781 yards. Otis made 3 pro bowls and 2 all-pros. In those seasons, he averaged 57 catches for 1076 yards.

Single-Season Dominance: Otis' best season was 58 catches for 1,297 yards and 8 TDs, averaging 22.4 yards per catch. Biletnikoff's best season was 61 catches for 1,037 yards and 17.0 yards per catch, with 6 TDs

Career Performance: Otis played in 130 games and made 410 catches for 7,306 yards and 57 TDs,17.8 yards per catch. Biletnikoff played in 190 games and made 589 catches for 8,974 yards and 76 TDs, with 15.2 yards per catch. See "longevity" below.

Longevity: This is the only area that the Raider wins, since he lasted 14 years, compared to Otis' 10 seasons (excluding one season where Otis was active but didn't catch any passes). Biletnikoff had 10 seasons where he caught 40+ passes, while Otis had 5.

So why does Biletnikoff get all the credit? He played longer, so he caught more passes. But in a typical game, Otis outplayed him, outgained him, and was a scarier guy to play against.

Man, it ticks me off that Otis doesn't get the attention, and that also-ran gets all the glory.

QFT, I've never understood why he is one of "the best ever". IIRC, there was another guy on the team who was way better, but no one every mentions him.

ill post name later

edit: I think his name was Powell.

[Mecca]

Fitzgerald does have some really awesome hands, he will catch basically anything near him.

[Smed1065]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Fitzgerald does have some really awesome hands, he will catch basically anything near him.

Learn Bowe, Learn!

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Fitzgerald does have some really awesome hands, he will catch basically anything near him.

Yeah, I've got nothing against Fitzgerald and he's certainly a dominant player, but five years into Wesley Walker's career, or John Jefferson's career, they were also dominant. I think there are other players who are more proven at this point over a five-year active player.

[stevieray]

Bilitnekoff was infamous for stickum on his hands. Otis' size is now considered normal. nuff said.

He, like Buck, Bobby and Wille, were ahead of their time.

[Hammock Parties]

Rain Man would have trolled the shit out of Raiders boards in 1970.

[sedated]

the first time I saw Otis, I thought he was a tight end.

until I saw him run.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by T-post Tom

Although he's not a WR, I'd put Tony G on par or better than anyone on the list.

I wouldn't.

For much of the early part (first 5 to 6 years) of his career, Tony had very inconsistent hands.

His consistent drops pissed me off.

[Pioli Zombie]

Yeah but Biletnikoff was white.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Skip Towne]

I saw that show too. They mentioned several times that this was about best hands, not best receiver. Of course Otis was a better receiver but Fred gave us nightmares for a very long time. And he sure was a goofy looking little dude.

[Rausch]

I'd have to go with Rice for hands.

He could juke, he could run, he could move, could block, but he cought the ball EVERY ****ING TIME.

I can't remember Jerry Rice ever dropping a ball...