Chiefs To the drafturbators... - Page 8

Hootie · 09-13-2010, 11:23 PM

**** you guys!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

we won because...

?

2010 draft class.

AND

Mark Sanchez?

He almost makes Matt Cassel look good!

(Nah, that's an exaggeration!)

Hahahahahahaha!!!

What a great feeling.

CLOUD
9

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Look what Reaper is saying is fine. McCluster had a really great return but the real greatness of it was blocking, the play itself was great all around. It wasn't a great individual effort the play was executed well from top to bottom.

Arenas had some more impressive individual returns even though they didn't pop big, what the hell is this argument even about?

yeah you're right

the blocking was great...

blah blah blah blah

the cut was shit

mccluster is terrible

dude broken record

take your lumps

you're a negative, piece of shit, fake ass fan

period.

go warm up your 2% for 15 seconds...grab an oreo...and call it a night

Brock · 09-14-2010, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Not nearly as tough as your memory is about tv shows.

That sounds suspiciously like meaningless babble. Which would surprise no one.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-14-2010, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

The stats are different because player stats don't account for yards lost on sacks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777

I think the total yards is including yards lost via sacks.

Thanks. I'll stop using that site for information.

Nothing pisses me off more than to find out I've quoted false info.

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Roger Saffold, Terrance Knighton, Matt Forte, Jonathan Goff, Thomas DeCoud, Cliff Avril, Brandon Tate, Thomas Morestead, Tyvon Branch, Jasper Brinkley, Cary Harris, Carl Nicks, among others.

Those are all starters I've gotten in the 3rd-7th rounds of the Mock in the last couple of years. There are others out there too that I'm just forgetting about.

damn dude put all of those guys on the same team and you might be able to beat Michigan at the big house!

nice job!

el borracho · 09-14-2010, 12:14 AM

Ah, post #4, aka the invisible post. Sometimes after a miracle win it's fun to pretend that McCluster will return a punt for a touchdown every game and that the Chiefs really don't need a legit QB, or NT or LBs.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-14-2010, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

Yeah, the Chargers had 400, or at least close to it. The majority of that was on Phillip Rivers. But, he was constantly harassed all game. And, the Chiefs defense was on the field for 37 minutes and 28 seconds.

Like I said, I wouldn't say dominated, but they played very well, against a good team, with a pro bowl QB that can move out of the pocket.

Oh, and let's not forget the three rookies in the secondary for much of the game.

The front seven had to play well to hide those guys.

Mecca · 09-14-2010, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

That sounds suspiciously like meaningless babble. Which would surprise no one.

Is it meaningless because it made you look like a reerun?

**Reaper16** · 09-14-2010, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Look what Reaper is saying is fine. McCluster had a really great return but the real greatness of it was blocking, the play itself was great all around. It wasn't a great individual effort the play was executed well from top to bottom.

Arenas had some more impressive individual returns even though they didn't pop big, what the hell is this argument even about?

The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

Brock · 09-14-2010, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Is it meaningless because it made you look like a reerun?

Nobody knows what you're talking about. You're making yourself look like a babbling fool, as usual. Get a real job, get your life together and move out of your mom's house, for chrissake.

Hootie · 09-14-2010, 12:16 AM

I think I'm mostly frustrated about the fact I crushed the spread this week and didn't **** bet on anything except my stupid ass pick'em game on ESPN I play every year to keep track of my spread record.

Mecca · 09-14-2010, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

It's Hootie, it's like arguing with a 2 year old.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-14-2010, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

damn dude put all of those guys on the same team and you might be able to beat Michigan at the big house!

nice job!

Yeah, but 3rd-7th round picks don't matter.

Like Will Shields, Brandon Carr, Dave Szott, Jamaal Charles, or Joe Horn.

Bunit · 09-14-2010, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

I be sayin' that I ain't knockin' the brotha', I just be sayin' that if you wanna' crown his ass then crown his ass. But it's week one and Dex be all goin' down on first contact and shit on offense and wasn't particularly impressive outside of a return that wasn't as amazing as ya'll cats is making it out to be. I hope he earn dat crown though.

We got a witty mother****er here. I know who you are man. You are one of the "cats" on this board who talk with each other and think you know more shit than people who get paid to know their shit. You all start sucking each others dick and soon enough you think that your opinions are set in stone. That's who you are, right?

**notorious** · 09-14-2010, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Thanks. I'll stop using that site for information.

Nothing pisses me off more than to find out I've quoted false info.

Sorry I was the 3rd person to tell you. It annoys me quite a bit to have several people tell me I am incorrect.

Mecca · 09-14-2010, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Nobody knows what you're talking about. You're making yourself look like a babbling fool, as usual.

I just love how the minute someone makes you look bad for a second, you hate them and must try to make them look bad at every turn.

It's a message board, no need for the little man syndrome.

09-13-2010, 11:23 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	To the drafturbators... **** you guys! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA we won because... ? 2010 draft class. AND Mark Sanchez? He almost makes Matt Cassel look good! (Nah, that's an exaggeration!) Hahahahahahaha!!! What a great feeling. CLOUD 9
Posts: 56,356

09-14-2010, 12:14 AM	#110
el borracho In Pat We Trust Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $2709148	Ah, post #4, aka the invisible post. Sometimes after a miracle win it's fun to pretend that McCluster will return a punt for a touchdown every game and that the Chiefs really don't need a legit QB, or NT or LBs.
Posts: 12,246

09-14-2010, 12:16 AM	#115
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I think I'm mostly frustrated about the fact I crushed the spread this week and didn't **** bet on anything except my stupid ass pick'em game on ESPN I play every year to keep track of my spread record.
Posts: 56,356