|
![]() |
Topic Starter |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Casino cash: $10006091
|
Who's D is better?
Oakland or KC Chiefs?
DL advantage Oakland Sapp, Burgess, Kelly, Sands are better than DUI BOY, Hali and the rest of scrub DT's. LB's advantage Oakland. Young LB's in Morrison, Howard, Williams are some of the most underated in the league. KC is pretty good with DJ being the best and NAP hasn't been the same since he left Oak town and Edwards is a stop gap at this point in his career. Secondary isn't even close as Oaklands young DB's have proved to be bigger playmakers playing in a tough man to man D instead of a crappy talent masking cover 2. Ty Law is one of the most overrated CB's ever and has made his name on 3 good games in his career. Overall stats Oakland 3 overall in league NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G Oakland 4557 284.8 2144 134.0 2413 150.8 332 20.8 Oaklands Pts allowed is amazing since they fielded the worst offense in the history of NFL last year. KC 16 overall in league NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G Kansas City 5262 328.9 1928 120.5 3334 208.4 315 19.7 Can't wait to see how the homers here spin their arguments that KC's D is better. |
Posts: 2,583
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|